Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35025541›Full record

ArticleJournal of consulting and clinical psychology2021

Effectiveness of the Body Project eating disorder prevention program for different racial and ethnic groups and an evaluation of the potential benefits of ethnic matching.

Eric Stice, Z Ayotola Onipede, Heather Shaw, Paul Rohde, Jeff M Gau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cost-effectiveness of Intervention Implementation Support for Reducing Eating Disorder Symptoms Among College Students.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eric SticeDepartment of Psychiatry, Stanford University.ORCID 0000-0002-9632-1540
Z Ayotola OnipedeDepartment of Psychiatry, Stanford University.
Heather ShawDepartment of Psychiatry, Stanford University.
Paul RohdeOregon Research Institute.
Jeff M GauOregon Research Institute.ORCID 0000-0002-4986-2512

Funding

Dissonance Eating Disorder Prevention: Clinician-Led, Peer-Led, vs Web-Delivered R01MH097720 · NIMH · OREGON RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI STICE, ERIC M · 2013 to 2017
$4.2M
Implementation Support for Prevention Program Delivery by College PeerEducatorsR01MH112743 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI STICE, ERIC M · 2018 to 2022
$3.3M
Eating Disorder Prevention Program Effectiveness TrialR01MH070699 · NIMH · OREGON RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI STICE, ERIC M · 2005 to 2009
$1.9M
NIH HHSNIMH NIH HHS R01 MH070699NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH097720NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112743
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveProvide an adequately powered tests of whether a group-delivered dissonance-based eating disorder prevention program (Body Project) is similarly effective for different racial and ethnic groups and evaluate whether an improved match between minority participant race/ethnicity and fellow group members is associated with larger effects.

methodStudy 1 examined data from 539 young women from seven high schools and four universities and Study 2 examined data from 1,195 young women and men from 50 universities who completed the Body Project, focusing on pretest-to-posttest reductions in outcomes.

resultsIn Study 1, reductions in thin-ideal internalization, body dissatisfaction, dieting, negative affect, and eating disorder symptoms did not significantly differ for White versus Asian, Black, and Native Americans, though we did not have power to contrast racial and ethnic minority groups. In Study 2, only one intervention effect was weaker for a minority group relative to Whites (Black vs. White participants showed smaller reductions in thin-ideal internalization), but there was evidence that intervention effects were significantly larger for Hispanic versus White and Black participants, and to a lesser extent for Hispanic versus Asian and Native Americans; these differences were partially driven by differences in pretest risk across ethnic groups. Ethnic/racial matching was not associated with larger effects.

conclusionsResults suggest that the Body Project produced relatively similar effects for racial/ethnic minority groups relative to White participants, that the effects were sometimes larger for Asian and Hispanic participants, and that recruiting Black participants at higher risk may contribute to larger effects for this racial group. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Body DissatisfactionFeeding and Eating DisordersEthnic and Racial MinoritiesEthnicityFemaleHumansMaleMinority Groups

Identifiers

PMID35025541
PMCPMC9422777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.