Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35025073›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2022

Vertebrae segmentation in reduced radiation CT imaging for augmented reality applications.

Ethan Schonfeld, Madeleine de Lotbiniere-Bassett, Tatiana Jansen, Diana Anthony, Anand Veeravagu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ethan SchonfeldNeurosurgery AI Lab and Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Madeleine de Lotbiniere-BassettDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Tatiana JansenStanford Health Care, Neurosurgery, Stanford, CA, USA.
Diana AnthonyStanford Health Care, Neurosurgery, Stanford, CA, USA.
Anand VeeravaguNeurosurgery AI Lab and Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. anand.veeravagu@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2929-1695

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere is growing evidence for the use of augmented reality (AR) navigation in spinal surgery to increase surgical accuracy and improve clinical outcomes. Recent research has employed AR techniques to create accurate auto-segmentations, the basis of patient registration, using reduced radiation dose intraoperative computed tomography images. In this study, we aimed to determine if spinal surgery AR applications can employ reduced radiation dose preoperative computed tomography (pCT) images.

methodsWe methodically decreased the imaging dose, with the addition of Gaussian noise, that was introduced into pCT images to determine the image quality threshold that was required for auto-segmentation. The Gaussian distribution's standard deviation determined noise level, such that a scalar multiplier (L: [0.00, 0.45], with steps of 0.03) simulated lower doses as L increased. We then enhanced the images with denoising algorithms to evaluate the effect on the segmentation.

resultsThe pCT radiation dose was decreased to below the current lowest clinical threshold and the resulting images produced segmentations that were appropriate for input into AR applications. This held true at simulated dose L = 0.06 (estimated 144 mAs) but not at L = 0.09 (estimated 136 mAs). The application of denoising algorithms to the images resulted in increased artifacts and decreased bone density.

conclusionsThe pCT image quality that is required for AR auto-segmentation is lower than that which is currently employed in spinal surgery. We recommend a reduced radiation dose protocol of approximately 140 mAs. This has the potential to reduce the radiation experienced by patients in comparison to procedures without AR support. Future research is required to identify the specific, clinically relevant radiation dose thresholds required for surgical navigation.

Indexed as

Augmented RealitySurgery, Computer-AssistedArtifactsHumansRadiation DosageSpineTomography, X-Ray ComputedArtificial intelligenceAugmented realityDose reductionRadiationSpine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.