Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35025005›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2022

Ki-67 and breast cancer prognosis: does it matter if Ki-67 level is examined using preoperative biopsy or postoperative specimen?

Soon Bo Choi, Jung Min Park, Jee Hyun Ahn, Jieon Go, Jeeye Kim, Hyung Seok Park, Seung Il Kim, Byeong-Woo Park, Seho Park

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Soon Bo ChoiDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0795-3851
Jung Min ParkDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jee Hyun AhnDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jieon GoDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jeeye KimDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyung Seok ParkDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seung Il KimDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Byeong-Woo ParkDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seho ParkDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. PSH1025@yuhs.ac.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8089-2755
Yonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to identify the association between Ki-67 level and the prognosis of patients with breast cancer, regardless of the timing of Ki-67 testing (using preoperative biopsy vs. postoperative specimen).

methodsA total of 4177 patients underwent surgery between January 2008 and December 2016. Immunohistochemical Ki-67 levels, using either preoperative (1673) or postoperative (2831) specimens, were divided into four groups using cutoff points of 10%, 15%, and 20%.

resultsGroups with higher-Ki-67 levels, in both the pre- and postoperative periods, showed significantly larger tumor size, higher grade, more frequent hormone receptor-negativity and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression, and active adjuvant treatments than groups with lower-Ki-67 levels. High-Ki-67 levels were also significantly associated with poor survival, irrespective of the timing of specimen examination.

conclusionDespite the problems associated with Ki-67, Ki-67 level is an important independent prognostic factor, regardless of the timing of Ki-67 testing, i.e., preoperative or postoperative testing.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsKi-67 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansPostoperative PeriodPrognosisReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneBiomarkers, TumorErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesKi-67 AntigenMKI67 protein, humanReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneBiopsyBreast cancerKi-67PrognosisSurgical specimen

Identifiers

PMID35025005
PMCPMC8926964
OpenAlexW4206093745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.