Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35024689›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2022

Concept review of regionalized systems of acute care: Is regionalization the next frontier in sepsis care?

Nathan T Walton, Nicholas M Mohr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Good and Bad of Regionalizing Colon Cancer Care.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Integration as innovation in healthcare systems.Healthcare management forum · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Toward Iran's health system regionalization: A qualitative approach.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nathan T WaltonUniversity of Iowa-Carver College of Medicine Iowa City Iowa USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4364-1882
Nicholas M MohrDepartments of Emergency Medicine, Anesthesia-Critical Care Medicine, and Epidemiology University of Iowa-Carver College of Medicine Iowa City Iowa USA.

Funding

SHORT-TERM TRAINING: STUDENTS IN HEALTH PROF. SCHOOLST35HL007485 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI ROGHAIR, ROBERT D · 1985 to 2019
$4.3M
AHRQ HHS K08 HS025753NHLBI NIH HHS T35 HL007485
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regionalization has become a buzzword in US health care policy. Regionalization, however, has varied meanings, and definitions have lacked contextual information important to understanding its role in improving care. This concept review is a comprehensive primer and summation of 8 common core components of the national models of regionalization informed by text-based analysis of the writing of involved organizations (professional, regulatory, and research) guided by semistructured interviews with organizational leaders. Further, this generalized model of regionalized care is applied to sepsis care, a novel discussion, drawing on existing small-scale applications. This discussion highlights the fit of regionalization principles to the sepsis care model and the actualized and perceived potential benefits. The principal aim of this concept review is to outline regionalization in the United States and provide a roadmap and novel discussion of regionalized care integration for sepsis care.

Indexed as

delivery of health careemergency servicehospital planningintegratedintensive care unitsregional medical programssepsis

Identifiers

PMID35024689
PMCPMC8733842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.