ArticleInternet interventions2022
Article in Internet interventions, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Randomized Controlled Trial of A Gamified Digital Mental Health Intervention for Child Anxiety.Child psychiatry and human development · 2026Article
- How Many Anxious Kids in Community Mental Health Would Be Eligible for an RCT? And Does It Matter? Insights from a Naturalistic Sample and a Non-Systematic Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Novel Casual Video Game With Simple Mental Health and Well-Being Concepts (Match Emoji): Mixed Methods Feasibility Study.JMIR serious games · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCompared to the evidence base for adult populations, less is known about the effectiveness of technology-assisted CBT interventions for children aged 12 and under in real-world settings.
aimsThis study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a technology-assisted CBT intervention called Pesky gNATs in primary care psychology services.
methodsA 2 × 3 (group by time) waitlist randomised controlled trial design was applied (
resultsOverall, no significant between-group differences were found on primary or secondary measures. Both intervention and waitlist control groups experienced significantly positive change across all timepoints. However, participant retention rate at Time 2 was 66%; and fell to 44% at Time 3. Intervention group feedback from children and parent at Time 2 indicated high levels of acceptability and satisfaction with Pesky gNATs. The RCI showed a statistically significant result at Time 2: more participants from the intervention group (
conclusionThis RCT did not demonstrate that Pesky gNATs is effective in providing clinically significant levels of change for low mood and anxiety. However, participant feedback showed high levels of acceptability and positive experiences However, given the high attrition rate and implementation challenges, further research is required to ascertain the effectiveness of technology-assisted CBT interventions such as Pesky gNATs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.