ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2021
Nuclei Detection for 3D Microscopy With a Fully Convolutional Regression Network.
Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Simple and Fast Optical Clearing Method for Whole-Mount Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) Imaging.Journal of biophotonics · 2025Article
- State-of-the-Art Deep Learning Methods for Microscopic Image Segmentation: Applications to Cells, Nuclei, and Tissues.Journal of imaging · 2024Review
- Automatic detection and counting of wheat spike based on DMseg-Count.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Digital labeling for 3D histology: segmenting blood vessels without a vascular contrast agent using deep learning.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Automated endocardial cushion segmentation and cellularization quantification in developing hearts using optical coherence tomography.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Advances in three-dimensional microscopy and tissue clearing are enabling whole-organ imaging with single-cell resolution. Fast and reliable image processing tools are needed to analyze the resulting image volumes, including automated cell detection, cell counting and cell analytics. Deep learning approaches have shown promising results in two- and three-dimensional nuclei detection tasks, however detecting overlapping or non-spherical nuclei of different sizes and shapes in the presence of a blurring point spread function remains challenging and often leads to incorrect nuclei merging and splitting. Here we present a new regression-based fully convolutional network that located a thousand nuclei centroids with high accuracy in under a minute when combined with V-net, a popular three-dimensional semantic-segmentation architecture. High nuclei detection F1-scores of 95.3% and 92.5% were obtained in two different whole quail embryonic hearts, a tissue type difficult to segment because of its high cell density, and heterogeneous and elliptical nuclei. Similar high scores were obtained in the mouse brain stem, demonstrating that this approach is highly transferable to nuclei of different shapes and intensities. Finally, spatial statistics were performed on the resulting centroids. The spatial distribution of nuclei obtained by our approach most resembles the spatial distribution of manually identified nuclei, indicating that this approach could serve in future spatial analyses of cell organization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.