Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35024192›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced research2022

In situ synthesis of hydroxyapatite nanorods on graphene oxide nanosheets and their reinforcement in biopolymer scaffold.

Cijun Shuai, Bo Peng, Pei Feng, Li Yu, Ruilin Lai, Anjie Min

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 201 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Graphene in 3D Bioprinting.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Antibiotic-loaded hydroxyapatite scaffolds fabricated fromInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cijun ShuaiState Key Laboratory of High Performance Complex Manufacturing, College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.
Bo PengState Key Laboratory of High Performance Complex Manufacturing, College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.
Pei FengState Key Laboratory of High Performance Complex Manufacturing, College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.
Li YuState Key Laboratory of High Performance Complex Manufacturing, College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.
Ruilin LaiState Key Laboratory of Powder Metallurgy, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.
Anjie MinDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Center of Stomatology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410078, China.
Central South University · CNXiangya Hospital Central South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: It is urgently needed to develop composite bone scaffold with excellent mechanical properties and bioactivity in bone tissue engineering. Combining graphene oxide (GO) and hydroxyapatite (HAP) for the reinforcement of biopolymer bone scaffold has emerged as a promising strategy. However, the dispersion of GO and HAP remains to be a big challenge. Objectives: In this present work, the mechanical properties of GO and the bioactivity of and HAP were combined respectively via in situ synthesis for reinforcing biopolymer bone scaffold. Methods: GO nanosheets were employed to in situ synthesize GO-HAP nanocomposite via hydrothermal reaction, in which their abundant oxygen-containing groups served as anchor sites for the chelation of Ca Results: GO nanosheets were uniformly decorated with HAP nanorods, which were about 60 nm in length and 5 nm in diameter. The compressive strength and modulus of PLLA/12%GO-HAP were significantly increased by 53.71% and 98.80% compared to the pure PLLA scaffold, respectively, explained on the base of pull out, crack bridging, deflection and pinning mechanisms. Meanwhile, the mineralization experiments indicated the PLLA/GO-HAP scaffold displayed good bioactivity by inducing the formation of apatite layer. Besides, cell culturing experiments demonstrated the favorable cytocompatibility of scaffold by promoting cell adhesion and proliferation. Conclusions: The present findings show the potential of PLLA/GO-HAP composite scaffold via in situ synthesis in bone tissue engineering.

Indexed as

DurapatiteNanotubesBiopolymersGraphiteTissue ScaffoldsBiopolymersDurapatitegraphene oxideGraphiteBioactivityGOHAPIn situ synthesisMechanical properties

Identifiers

PMID35024192
PMCPMC8721358
OpenAlexW3150362314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.