Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35024172›Full record

ArticleScars, burns & healing

Evolution of a concept with enzymatic debridement and autologous in situ cell and platelet-rich fibrin therapy (BroKerF).

Matthias Waldner, Tarek Ismail, Alexander Lunger, Holger J Klein, Riccardo Schweizer, Oramary Alan, Tabea Breckwoldt, Pietro Giovanoli, Jan A Plock

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scars, burns & healing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthias WaldnerPlastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7123-4205
Tarek IsmailDivision of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Alexander LungerDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Holger J KleinPlastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Riccardo SchweizerPlastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Oramary AlanDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria.
Tabea BreckwoldtMedizinische Fakultät, Universität Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Pietro GiovanoliPlastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jan A PlockMedizinische Fakultät, Universität Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
University Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of Zurich · CHMedical University of Vienna · ATUniversity Hospital of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeep partial-thickness burns are traditionally treated by tangential excision and split thickness skin graft (STSG) coverage. STSGs create donor site morbidity and increase the wound surface in burn patients. Herein, we present a novel concept consisting of enzymatic debridement of deep partial-thickness burns followed by co-delivery of autologous keratinocyte suspension and plated-rich fibrin (PRF) or fibrin glue. MATERIAL AND

methodsIn a retrospective case study, patients with deep partial-thickness burns treated with enzymatic debridement and autologous cell therapy combined with PRF or fibrin glue (BroKerF) between 2017 and 2018 were analysed. BroKerF was applied to up to 15% total body surface area (TBSA); larger injuries were combined with surgical excision and skin grafting. Exclusion criteria were age <18 or >70 years, I°, IIa°-only, III° burns and loss of follow-up.

resultsA total of 20 patients with burn injuries of 16.8% ± 10.3% TBSA and mean Abbreviated Burn Severity Score 5.45 ± 1.8 were identified. Of the patients, 65% (n = 13) were treated with PRF, while 35% (n = 7) were treated with fibrin glue. The mean area treated with BroKerF was 7.5% ± 0.05% TBSA, mean time to full epithelialization was 21.06 ± 9.2 days and mean hospitalization time was 24.7 ± 14.4 days. Of the patients, 35% (n = 7) needed additional STSG, 43% (n = 3) of whom had biopsy-proven wound infections.

conclusionBroKerF is an innovative treatment strategy, which, in our opinion, will show its efficacy when higher standardization is achieved. The combination of selective debridement and autologous skin cells in a fibrin matrix combines regenerative measures for burn treatment. LAY SUMMARY: Patients suffering from large burn wounds often require the use of large skin grafts to bring burned areas to heal. Before the application of skin grafts, the burned skin must be removed either by surgery or using enzymatic agents. In this article, we describe a method where small areas of skin are taken and skin cells are extracted and sprayed on wound areas that were treated with an enzymatic agent. The cells are held in place by a substance extracted from patients' blood (PRF) that is sprayed on the wound together with the skin cells. We believe this technique can be helpful to reduce the need of skin grafts in burned patients and improve the healing process.

Indexed as

autologous skin cellsBurnsenzymatic debridementnexobridPRF

Identifiers

PMID35024172
PMCPMC8743980
OpenAlexW4205536763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.