Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35024144›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2022

Treatment outcomes and its associated factors among breast cancer patients at Kitui Referral Hospital.

Mwendwa Dickson Wambua, Amsalu Degu, Gobezie T Tegegne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mwendwa Dickson WambuaDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, United States International University-Africa, Nairobi, Kenya.
Amsalu DeguDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, United States International University-Africa, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6562-0548
Gobezie T TegegneDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDespite breast cancer treatment outcomes being relatively poor or heterogeneous among breast cancer patients, there was a paucity of data in the African settings, especially in Kenya. Hence, this study aimed to determine treatment outcomes among breast cancer patients at Kitui Referral Hospital.

methodsA hospital-based retrospective cohort study design was conducted among adult patients with breast cancer. All eligible breast cancer patients undergoing treatment from January 2015 to June 2020 in the study setting were included. Hence, a total of 116 breast cancer patients' medical records were involved in the study. Patients' medical records were retrospectively reviewed using a predesigned data abstraction tool. The data were entered, cleaned, and analyzed using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) version 26 software. Descriptive analysis-such as percentage, frequency, mean, and figures-was used to present the data. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to estimate the mean survival estimate across different variables. A Cox regression analysis was employed to determine factors associated with mortality.

resultsThe study showed that the overall survival and mortality rate was 62.9% (73) and 37.1% (43), respectively. The regression analysis showed that patients who had an advanced stage of disease had a 3.82 times risk of dying (crude hazard ratio= 3.82, 95% confidence interval = 1.5-9.8) than an early stage of the disease. Besides, patients with distant metastasis had 4.4 times more hazards of dying than (crude hazard ratio = 4.4, 95% confidence interval = 2.1-9.4) their counterparts.

conclusionThe treatment outcome of breast cancer patients was poor, and its overall mortality among breast cancer patients was higher in the study setting. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, the tumor size was the only statistically significant predictor of mortality among breast cancer patients. Stakeholders at each stage should, therefore, prepare a relevant strategy to improve treatment outcomes.

Indexed as

Breast cancerKitui Referral Hospitaltreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID35024144
PMCPMC8744162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.