ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2022
Network-based prioritization of cancer biomarkers by phenotype-driven module detection and ranking.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dissecting the multi-omics landscape of TEAD1 in hepatocellular carcinoma: cycle regulation and metastatic potential.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based prognostic modeling of lysosome-related genes for predicting prognosis and immune status of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Development and validation of a copper-related gene prognostic signature in hepatocellular carcinoma.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Article
- Identifying the critical states and dynamic network biomarkers of cancers based on network entropy.Journal of translational medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper describes an ensemble method with supervised module detection and further module prioritization for reliable network-based biomarker discovery. We design a module detection and ranking method called mRank to discover reliable network modules as cancer diagnostic biomarkers, with two procedures: (1) an iterative supervised module detection guided by phenotypic states in a specific network, (2) a block-based module ranking locally and globally via network topological centrality. We validate its effectiveness and efficiency by identifying hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) network modules on a comprehensive gene regulatory network with specifying gene interactions by HCC RNA-seq data from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). These top-ranked modules by mRank get a mean AUC of 0.995 on TCGA HCC dataset with 371 tumor samples and 50 controls by cross-validation SVM. Based on the prior knowledge of cancer dysfunctions enriched in top-ranked modules, 69 genes are identified as HCC candidate biomarkers. They are further validated in independent cohorts with a classifier trained on TCGA HCC dataset. A mean AUC of 0.846 is achieved in distinguishing 976 disease samples from 827 controls. Moreover, some known HCC signatures such as AFP and SPP1 are also included in our identified biomarkers. mRank enables us to find more reliable network modules for cancer diagnosis. For a proof-of-concept study, we validate it in identifying HCC network biomarkers and it is generalizable to other cancers or complex disease. The overall results have demonstrated that mRank can find effective network biomarkers for cancer diagnosis which result in less false positives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.