Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35024093›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2022

Network-based prioritization of cancer biomarkers by phenotype-driven module detection and ranking.

Haixia Shang, Zhi-Ping Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Haixia ShangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Control Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250061, China.
Zhi-Ping LiuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Control Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250061, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper describes an ensemble method with supervised module detection and further module prioritization for reliable network-based biomarker discovery. We design a module detection and ranking method called mRank to discover reliable network modules as cancer diagnostic biomarkers, with two procedures: (1) an iterative supervised module detection guided by phenotypic states in a specific network, (2) a block-based module ranking locally and globally via network topological centrality. We validate its effectiveness and efficiency by identifying hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) network modules on a comprehensive gene regulatory network with specifying gene interactions by HCC RNA-seq data from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). These top-ranked modules by mRank get a mean AUC of 0.995 on TCGA HCC dataset with 371 tumor samples and 50 controls by cross-validation SVM. Based on the prior knowledge of cancer dysfunctions enriched in top-ranked modules, 69 genes are identified as HCC candidate biomarkers. They are further validated in independent cohorts with a classifier trained on TCGA HCC dataset. A mean AUC of 0.846 is achieved in distinguishing 976 disease samples from 827 controls. Moreover, some known HCC signatures such as AFP and SPP1 are also included in our identified biomarkers. mRank enables us to find more reliable network modules for cancer diagnosis. For a proof-of-concept study, we validate it in identifying HCC network biomarkers and it is generalizable to other cancers or complex disease. The overall results have demonstrated that mRank can find effective network biomarkers for cancer diagnosis which result in less false positives.

Indexed as

Biomarker discoveryBlock-based module rankingMachine learningNetwork biotechnologyPhenotype-driven module detection

Identifiers

PMID35024093
PMCPMC8715301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.