Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35024016›Full record

ArticleOccupational therapy international2021

Preparing Advanced Clinicians and Practitioners: A Model for Mentorship in Occupational Therapy Practice.

Sarah A Schoen, Bryan M Gee, Mim Ochsenbein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Occupational therapy international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah A SchoenSTAR Institute, Centennial, Colorado 80112, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3060-824X
Bryan M GeePost Professional Doctor of Occupational Therapy Program, Rocky Mountain University of Health Professions, Provo, Utah 84606, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7403-5140
Mim OchsenbeinSTAR Institute, Centennial, Colorado 80112, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mentoring is essential at all stages of a professional career. However, little has been written about the effectiveness of programs for practicing clinicians. This study was designed to address the need for evidence about the effectiveness of formal mentorship programs by describing the impact of the STAR mentorship program on a group of clinicians specializing in sensory integration and processing challenges. This study utilized an exploratory, retrospective, survey research design. Course evaluations were examined from 240 subjects following participation in a one-week, small group mentorship training program. Qualitative methods were adapted for use in this study. Sixteen codes, with operational definitions, were developed to analyze the surveys. Ninety-six percent indicated that the program met or exceeded their expectations; only 12.5% had a negative comment.

Indexed as

MentoringOccupational TherapyHumansMentorsRetrospective StudiesSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID35024016
PMCPMC8714379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.