Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35023931›Full record

ReviewAdvances and applications in bioinformatics and chemistry : AABC2022

Binding Analysis Using Accelerated Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Future Perspectives.

Shristi Pawnikar, Apurba Bhattarai, Jinan Wang, Yinglong Miao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances and applications in bioinformatics and chemistry : AABC, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Applications of Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Drug Discovery.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Review
  13. Molecular Dynamics as a Tool for Virtual Ligand Screening.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shristi PawnikarCenter for Computational Biology and Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, 66047, USA.
Apurba BhattaraiCenter for Computational Biology and Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, 66047, USA.
Jinan WangCenter for Computational Biology and Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, 66047, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0162-212X
Yinglong MiaoCenter for Computational Biology and Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, 66047, USA.

Funding

Enhanced Sampling of G-Protein-Coupled Receptor-G Protein InteractionsR01GM132572 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MIAO, YINGLONG · 2019 to 2023
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM132572
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomolecular recognition such as binding of small molecules, nucleic acids, peptides and proteins to their target receptors plays key roles in cellular function and has been targeted for therapeutic drug design. Molecular dynamics (MD) is a computational approach to analyze these binding processes at an atomistic level, which provides valuable understandings of the mechanisms of biomolecular recognition. However, the rather slow biomolecular binding events often present challenges for conventional MD (cMD), due to limited simulation timescales (typically over hundreds of nanoseconds to tens of microseconds). In this regard, enhanced sampling methods, particularly accelerated MD (aMD), have proven useful to bridge the gap and enable all-atom simulations of biomolecular binding events. Here, we will review the recent method developments of Gaussian aMD (GaMD), ligand GaMD (LiGaMD) and peptide GaMD (Pep-GaMD), which have greatly expanded our capabilities to simulate biomolecular binding processes. Spontaneous binding of various biomolecules to their receptors has been successfully simulated by GaMD. Microsecond LiGaMD and Pep-GaMD simulations have captured repetitive binding and dissociation of small-molecule ligands and highly flexible peptides, and thus enabled ligand/peptide binding thermodynamics and kinetics calculations. We will also present relevant application studies in simulations of important drug targets and future perspectives for rational computer-aided drug design.

Indexed as

accelerated molecular dynamicsbiomolecular recognitiondrug designkineticsthermodynamics

Identifiers

PMID35023931
PMCPMC8747661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.