Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35023909›Full record

ArticleClinical interventions in aging2022

Clinical Interventions to Improve Nutritional Care in Older Adults and Patients in Primary Healthcare - A Scoping Review of Current Practices of Health Care Practitioners.

Sonja Lindner-Rabl, Valentina Wagner, Andreas Matijevic, Carolin Herzog, Christina Lampl, Julia Traub, Regina Roller-Wirnsberger

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Barriers and facilitators in the implementation of nutrition interventions to prevent or treat malnutrition in older adults: A scoping review.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. An exploration of the self-perceived nutrition competencies of pharmacists.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sonja Lindner-RablMedical University of Graz, Department of Internal Medicine, Research Unit for Aging and Old Age Medicine, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7794-3117
Valentina WagnerMedical University of Graz, Department of Internal Medicine, Research Unit for Aging and Old Age Medicine, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4027-8993
Andreas MatijevicMedical University of Graz, Department of Internal Medicine, Research Unit for Aging and Old Age Medicine, Graz, Austria.
Carolin HerzogMedical University of Graz, Department of Internal Medicine, Research Unit for Aging and Old Age Medicine, Graz, Austria.
Christina LamplMedical University of Graz, Department of Internal Medicine, Research Unit for Aging and Old Age Medicine, Graz, Austria.
Julia TraubUniversity Hospital Graz, Department of Clinical Medical Nutrition, Graz, Austria.
Regina Roller-WirnsbergerMedical University of Graz, Department of Internal Medicine, Research Unit for Aging and Old Age Medicine, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1273-6520
Medical University of Graz · ATGraz University Hospital · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In light of the increasing life expectancy of Europe's population and the rising significance of active and healthy ageing relating thereto, an integrated approach of nutritional care within primary health care is gaining importance. The aim of the review was to summarize evidence on the effectiveness of nutritional interventions in primary health care. The scoping review is based upon a comprehensive literature search of relevant literature published between January 2010 and August 2021 in PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase and Medline databases. Overall, 15 studies were included for evidence synthesis and interventions were basically clustered according to their type, into 1) eHealth and tele-medical interventions; 2) targeted single interventions; and 3) comprehensive, multi-faceted interventions. The review presents diverging evidence regarding the efficacy and effectiveness of interventions for nutritional care in primary health care, however, demonstrates encouraging outcomes. eHealth and tele-medical interventions partly show a careful positive tendency. Likewise, manifold single interventions on patient level present significant improvements in patient health outcomes. Multifaceted and comprehensive interventions found in the literature also partly demonstrate significant changes in intervention groups. Primary health care represents a critical setting for the care of older citizens and patients with complex health needs. This scoping review provides an overview of current nutrition care practices in primary health care and results reinforce the need to strengthen implementation of multi-faceted interventions carried out by the inter-disciplinary primary care team for advanced nutritional care.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareTelemedicineAgedHumansNutritional Supportmalnutritionnutritional careolder peopleprimary care

Identifiers

PMID35023909
PMCPMC8747528
OpenAlexW4205384286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.