ArticleHippokratia
Dense deposit disease in an adolescent male mimicking acute post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis.
Article in Hippokratia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDense deposit disease (DDD), a subtype of complement factor 3 glomerulopathy (C3G), is a rare entity associated with dysregulation of the alternative complement pathway. It usually affects children, with a 50% likelihood of progression to end-stage renal disease within ten years of diagnosis. Description of the case: We report the case of an adolescent male with acute nephritic syndrome and nephrotic range proteinuria, initially diagnosed as acute post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis (APSGN). Despite his spontaneous improvement, renal biopsy, performed due to a persistently low C3 level for over 18 weeks, confirmed the diagnosis of DDD. Complement and genetic studies showed high levels of C3-nephritic factor and risk polymorphisms for developing the disease. He was treated with prednisolone and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). At the last follow-up, 15 months from onset, the serum creatinine level and 24h-hour total protein excretion were normal.
conclusionC3G (including the DDD subtype) should be suspected in apparent APSGN with atypical clinical features at presentation/follow-up, even in the case of spontaneous improvement. Timely and accurate diagnosis, based on histopathological, complement, and genetic studies, is important to initiate the appropriate treatment aimed at preventing or slowing the disease progression. HIPPOKRATIA 2020, 24(4): 191-193.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35023895PMC8747577W4206864283What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.