Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35023565›Full record

ArticleSleep2022

Sleep deficiency in spaceflight is associated with degraded neurobehavioral functions and elevated stress in astronauts on six-month missions aboard the International Space Station.

Christopher W Jones, Mathias Basner, Daniel J Mollicone, Christopher M Mott, David F Dinges

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06531733 (Sleep and Wake Countermeasures for Artemis), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06531733 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Sleep and Wake Countermeasures for Artemis: In-laboratory Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)Ran2024 to 2025Enrolled24ConditionsFatigueArmsSleep Promoting (pink noise), Wake Promoting (blue enriched light plus a nap)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. The futuristic manifolds of REM sleep.Journal of sleep research · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher W JonesDepartment of Psychiatry, Unit for Experimental Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8173-721X
Mathias BasnerDepartment of Psychiatry, Unit for Experimental Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8453-0812
Daniel J MolliconePulsar Informatics, Inc., Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Christopher M MottPulsar Informatics, Inc., Philadelphia, PA, USA.
David F DingesDepartment of Psychiatry, Unit for Experimental Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · USPulsar Informatics (United States) · US

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM/RESPIRATORY NEUROBIOLOGY AND SLEEPT32HL007713 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI PACK, ALLAN I · 1992 to 2022
$11.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007713
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Astronauts are required to maintain optimal neurobehavioral functioning despite chronic exposure to the stressors and challenges of spaceflight. Sleep of adequate quality and duration is fundamental to neurobehavioral functioning, however astronauts commonly experience short sleep durations in spaceflight (<6 h). As humans embark on long-duration space exploration missions, there is an outstanding need to identify the consequences of sleep deficiency in spaceflight on neurobehavioral functions. Therefore, we conducted a longitudinal study that examined the sleep-wake behaviors, neurobehavioral functions, and ratings of stress and workload of N = 24 astronauts before, during, and after 6-month missions aboard the International Space Station (ISS). The computerized, Reaction SelfTest (RST), gathered astronaut report of sleep-wake behaviors, stress, workload, and somatic behavioral states; the RST also objectively assessed vigilant attention (i.e. Psychomotor Vigilance Test-Brief). Data collection began 180 days before launch, continued every 4 days in-flight aboard the ISS, and up to 90 days post-landing, which produced N = 2,856 RSTs. Consistent with previous ISS studies, astronauts reported sleeping ~6.5 h in-flight. The adverse consequences of short sleep were observed across neurobehavioral functions, where sleep durations <6 h were associated with significant reductions in psychomotor response speed, elevated stress, and higher workload. Sleep durations <5 h were associated with elevated negative somatic behavioral states. Furthermore, longer sleep durations had beneficial effects on astronaut neurobehavioral functions. Taken together, our findings highlight the importance of sleep for the maintenance of neurobehavioral functioning and as with humans on Earth, astronauts would likely benefit from interventions that promote sleep duration and quality.

Indexed as

AstronautsSpace FlightHumansLongitudinal StudiesSleepTime Factorsastronautsleepsleep lossspaceflightstressvigilant attention

Identifiers

PMID35023565
PMCPMC8919197
OpenAlexW4206645043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.