Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35023416›Full record

ArticlePublic health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)

COVID-19 Testing Among US Children, Parental Preferences for Testing Venues, and Acceptability of School-Based Testing.

Chloe A Teasdale, Luisa N Borrell, Yanhan Shen, Spencer Kimball, Michael L Rinke, Madhura S Rane, Sarah Kulkarni, Sasha A Fleary, Denis Nash

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Flavored Tobacco Product Use Among California Adolescents Before and Immediately After a Statewide Flavor Ban.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Chloe A TeasdaleDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, City University of New York (CUNY) Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9165-8972
Luisa N BorrellDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, City University of New York (CUNY) Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York, NY, USA.
Yanhan ShenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, City University of New York (CUNY) Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York, NY, USA.
Spencer KimballEmerson College, Boston, MA, USA.
Michael L RinkeDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Montefiore and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Madhura S RaneInstitute for Implementation Science in Population Health, CUNY, New York, NY, USA.
Sarah KulkarniDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Sasha A FlearyInstitute for Implementation Science in Population Health, CUNY, New York, NY, USA.
Denis NashDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, City University of New York (CUNY) Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York, NY, USA.
City University of New York · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USColumbia University · USEmerson College · USThe Graduate Center, CUNY · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTesting remains critical for identifying pediatric cases of COVID-19 and as a public health intervention to contain infections. We surveyed US parents to measure the proportion of children tested for COVID-19 since the start of the pandemic, preferred testing venues for children, and acceptability of school-based COVID-19 testing.

methodsWe conducted an online survey of 2074 US parents of children aged ≤12 years in March 2021. We applied survey weights to generate national estimates, and we used Rao-Scott adjusted Pearson χ

resultsAmong US parents, 35.9% reported their youngest child had ever been tested for COVID-19. Parents who were female versus male (aRR = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.60-0.79), Asian versus non-Hispanic White (aRR = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39-0.87), and from the Midwest versus the Northeast (aRR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63-0.91) were less likely to report testing of a child. Children who had health insurance versus no health insurance (aRR = 1.38; 95% CI, 1.05-1.81), were attending in-person school/daycare versus not attending (aRR = 1.67; 95% CI, 1.43-1.95), and were from households with annual household income ≥$100 000 versus income <$50 000-$99 999 (aRR = 1.19; 95% CI, 1.02-1.40) were more likely to have tested for COVID-19. Half of parents (52.7%) reported the pediatrician's office as the most preferred testing venue, and 50.6% said they would allow their youngest child to be tested for COVID-19 at school/daycare if required.

conclusionsGreater efforts are needed to ensure access to COVID-19 testing for US children, including those without health insurance.

Indexed as

AdultAmbulatory Care FacilitiesChildChild, PreschoolCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParentsPatient Acceptance of Health CarePhysicians' OfficesSARS-CoV-2SchoolschildrenCOVID-19pediatric testingschool-based testingtesting venues

Identifiers

PMID35023416
PMCPMC8900230
OpenAlexW4206392028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.