Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35023179›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2022

Timing is everything - obtaining accurate measures of plant uptake of amino acids.

Henrik Svennerstam, Sandra Jämtgård

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Henrik SvennerstamUmeå Plant Science Centre, Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, SE-901 83, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3096-5028
Sandra JämtgårdUmeå Plant Science Centre, Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, SE-901 83, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5222-7878

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants are known to have the capacity to take up and utilise amino acids for growth. The significance of this uptake, however, remains elusive, partly due to methodological challenges and biological implications associated with acquiring and interpreting data. This study compared bulk stable isotope analysis and compound-specific liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, two established methods for determining amino acid uptake. Root amino acid uptake was assayed using U-

Indexed as

Amino AcidsArabidopsisCarbon IsotopesGlutamineNitrogenNitrogen IsotopesPlant RootsAmino AcidsCarbon IsotopesGlutamineNitrogenNitrogen Isotopesamino acidsArabidopsis thalianaEA-IRMSglutamineisotopesLC-MSorganic nitrogenplant uptake

Identifiers

PMID35023179
PMCPMC9303729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.