ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2022
Enhanced head-skull shape learning using statistical modeling and topological features.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inside from outside: head-to-skull-and-muscles translation with statistical shape relation and multiple region-of-interest learning.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Fast 3D Face Reconstruction from a Single Image Using Different Deep Learning Approaches for Facial Palsy Patients.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skull prediction from the head is a challenging issue toward a cost-effective therapeutic solution for facial disorders. This issue was initially studied in our previous work using full head-to-skull relationship learning. However, the head-skull thickness topology is locally shaped, especially in the face region. Thus, the objective of the present study was to enhance our head-to-skull prediction problem by using local topological features for training and predicting. Head and skull feature points were sampled on 329 head and skull models from computed tomography (CT) images. These feature points were classified into the back and facial topologies. Head-to-skull relations were trained using the partial least square regression (PLSR) models separately in the two topologies. A hyperparameter tuning process was also conducted for selecting optimal parameters for each training model. Thus, a new skull could be generated so that its shape was statistically fitted with the target head. Mean errors of the predicted skulls using the topology-based learning method were better than those using the non-topology-based learning method. After tenfold cross-validation, the mean error was enhanced 36.96% for the skull shapes and 14.17% for the skull models. Mean error in the facial skull region was especially improved with 4.98%. The mean errors were also improved 11.71% and 25.74% in the muscle attachment regions and the back skull regions respectively. Moreover, using the enhanced learning strategy, the errors (mean ± SD) for the best and worst prediction cases are from 1.1994 ± 1.1225 mm (median: 0.9036, coefficient of multiple determination (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
35023072What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.