Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35023041›Full record

ArticleJournal of community genetics2022

YouTube as an information source on BRCA mutations: implications for patients and professionals.

Priscila E Laforet, Bhavya Yalamanchili, Grace C Hillyer, Corey H Basch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Lights genes action: Video strategy forGynecologic oncology reports · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Role of Social Media as a Resource for Mental Health Care.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2023
    Article
  7. Realfood and Cancer: Analysis of the Reliability and Quality of YouTube Content.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Observational
  8. Evaluation of YouTube Videos on Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of Korean medical science · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Priscila E LaforetDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University NY, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Bhavya YalamanchiliDepartment of Public Health, William Paterson University, University Hall, Wayne, NJ, 07470, USA.
Grace C HillyerDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University NY, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Corey H BaschDepartment of Public Health, William Paterson University, University Hall, Wayne, NJ, 07470, USA. baschc@wpunj.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic testing for BRCA1/2 mutations in early breast cancer has been shown to be beneficial, and an increase in surveillance using these genetic markers is recommended. Given this recommendation, it is likely that individuals gather information about such testing. Social media is increasingly becoming a common source of health information. One such platform known for sharing health information is YouTube. The purpose of this study was to describe content related to BRCA1/2 mutations on YouTube. The sample included 100 English language videos, which were coded for content related to BRCA1/2 mutations. The 100 videos evaluated in this study were viewed 5.5 million times. In general, the BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations were mentioned simultaneously, with only 15% of videos explaining the difference in prevalence or implication of the variants individually. A great number of videos (85.0%) discussed having genetic testing to determine the presence of BRCA mutations, but only 16.0% discussed the potential harms of BRCA mutation testing and 42.0% mentioned seeking genetic counseling to determine the need for testing and interpretation of the test results. Comparing the characteristics and content of videos created by healthcare professionals (n = 71) to those created by consumers and the media (n = 29), we found that consumer/media videos were viewed twice as many times as professional videos (3,704,351 vs. 1,851,825, p = 0.04). Videos from medical professionals should include consistent information on the recommendations for individuals who test positive for a BRCA mutation. Such content should include education about BRCA mutations, testing, implications of those results and ways to reduce risk, and recommendations for increased surveillance and enhanced screening for individuals positive for BRCA mutations.

Identifiers

PMID35023041
PMCPMC8941008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.