Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35023033›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2022

Iterative Changes in Risk-Stratified Pancreatectomy Clinical Pathways and Accelerated Discharge After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Andrew D Newton, Timothy E Newhook, Morgan L Bruno, Laura Prakash, Yi-Ju Chiang, Natalia Paez Arango, Whitney L Dewhurst, Elsa M Arvide, Naruhiko Ikoma, Jessica E Maxwell and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Short-Term Outcomes and Cost of Robotic Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy During the Initial Phase of a Robotic Pancreatectomy Program.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evaluation and Recalibration of Risk-Stratified Pancreatoduodenectomy Drain Fluid Amylase Removal Criteria.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Article
  9. Postoperative Opioid Use Is Associated with Increased Rates of Grade B/C Pancreatic Fistula After Distal Pancreatectomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Incidence of Postoperative Complications Following Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Cystic Lesions or Pancreatic Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew D NewtonDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Timothy E NewhookDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Morgan L BrunoDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Laura PrakashDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Yi-Ju ChiangDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Natalia Paez ArangoDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Whitney L DewhurstDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Elsa M ArvideDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Naruhiko IkomaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Jessica E MaxwellDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Michael P KimDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Jeffrey E LeeDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Matthew H G KatzDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Ching-Wei D TzengDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. CDTzeng@mdanderson.org.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious implementation of risk-stratified pancreatectomy clinical pathways (RSPCPs) decreased length of stay (LOS) following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). This study's primary aim was to measure the association of iterative RSPCP revisions with accelerated discharge and early postoperative outcomes.

methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study of a prospectively maintained surgical database (10/2016-9/2020). In February 2019, revised RSPCPs were implemented with earlier nasogastric tube (NGT) removal (postoperative day [POD] 1 for low risk; POD 2 for high risk) and updated drain fluid amylase cutoffs for POD 1/POD 3 removal. Perioperative outcomes between original and revised pathways were compared. Predictors of accelerated discharge (defined as ≤ POD 5 for low risk; ≤ POD 6 for high risk) were identified.

resultsThere were 233 (36% high risk) patients in original and 131 (32% high risk) in revised RSPCPs. After revision, the rate of POD 1 NGT removal was higher while POD ≤ 3 drain removal was similar. Median LOS decreased for low risk (5 vs. 6 days, p = 0.011) and high risk (6 vs. 9 days, p = 0.005) with no increase in delayed gastric emptying, postoperative pancreatic fistula, or readmissions. With POD 1 NGT removal, diet tolerance was earlier without increased NGT reinsertions. In low-risk patients, younger age, POD 1 NGT removal, and POD ≤ 3 drain removal were independent predictors of accelerated discharge. In high-risk patients, POD 1 NGT removal and POD ≤ 3 drain removal were independent predictors of accelerated discharge.

conclusionsFollowing iterative revisions in RSPCPs, LOS after PD decreased further without increasing readmissions, and NGTs were removed earlier without increased reinsertions. Early NGT and drain removal are modifiable practices within RSPCPs that are associated with accelerated discharge.

Indexed as

PancreatectomyPancreaticoduodenectomyCritical PathwaysDrainageHumansPancreatic FistulaPatient DischargePostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAccelerated dischargeEnhanced recoveryFast-trackPancreatectomyPancreaticoduodenectomy

Identifiers

PMID35023033
OpenAlexW4206380088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.