Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35022971›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022

Persistence evaluation of fluopyram + tebuconazole residues on mango and pomegranate and their risk assessment.

Vandana Tripathy, Krishan Kumar Sharma, Soudamini Mohapatra, Lekha Siddamallaiah, Nagapooja Yogendraiah Matadha, Chidanand Shiveshankar Patil, Yogesh Subhash Saindane, Bhaidas Deore, Cherukuri Sreenivasa Rao, Kaushik D Parmar and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Vandana TripathyProject Coordinating Cell, Pesticide Residue Laboratory, All India Network Project On Pesticide Residues, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110 012, India.
Krishan Kumar SharmaProject Coordinating Cell, Pesticide Residue Laboratory, All India Network Project On Pesticide Residues, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110 012, India. kksaicrp@yahoo.co.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5621-1603
Soudamini MohapatraIndian Institute of Horticultural Research (IIHR), All India Network Project On Pesticide Residues, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Lekha SiddamallaiahIndian Institute of Horticultural Research (IIHR), All India Network Project On Pesticide Residues, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Nagapooja Yogendraiah MatadhaIndian Institute of Horticultural Research (IIHR), All India Network Project On Pesticide Residues, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Chidanand Shiveshankar PatilMahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth (MPKV), All India Network Project On Pesticide Residues, Rahuri, Maharashtra, India.
Yogesh Subhash SaindaneMahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth (MPKV), All India Network Project On Pesticide Residues, Rahuri, Maharashtra, India.
Bhaidas DeoreMahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth (MPKV), All India Network Project On Pesticide Residues, Rahuri, Maharashtra, India.
Cherukuri Sreenivasa RaoProfessor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University (PJTSAU), All India Network Project On Pesticide Residues, Rajendranagar, Telangana, India.
Kaushik D ParmarAnand Agricultural University (AAU), All India Network Project On Pesticide Residues, Anand, Gujarat, India.
Nitesh S LitoriyaAnand Agricultural University (AAU), All India Network Project On Pesticide Residues, Anand, Gujarat, India.
Paresh G ShahAnand Agricultural University (AAU), All India Network Project On Pesticide Residues, Anand, Gujarat, India.
Khushbu SharmaProject Coordinating Cell, Pesticide Residue Laboratory, All India Network Project On Pesticide Residues, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110 012, India.
Anand Agricultural University · INIndian Council of Agricultural Research · INIndian Institute of Horticultural Research · INMahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth · INProfessor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University · IN

Funding

Bayer CropScience Project No.: 79-51Bayer CropScience TG No. 1930Indian Council of Agricultural Research F. No. CS.8/2/2017-IA-III
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The persistence of combination formulation of fluopyram 200 + tebuconazole 200-400 SC was evaluated across different agro-climates in India for the management of fungal diseases in two commercially important fruit crops, mango and pomegranate. The residues were extracted using quick easy cheap effective rugged and safe (QuEChERS) method and quantification was done on liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The fungicide degradation followed 1st-order kinetics and the half-lives were 2.9-6.4 days for mango, and 3.5-7.4 days for pomegranate for both the fungicides. On the basis of Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) maximum residue limit (MRL) calculation, 1.0 mg kg

Indexed as

Fungicides, IndustrialMangiferaPesticide ResiduesPomegranateBenzamidesChromatography, LiquidFruitPyridinesRisk AssessmentTandem Mass SpectrometryTriazolesBenzamidesFungicides, IndustrialN-(2-(3-chloro-5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridyl)ethyl)-alpha,alpha,alpha-trifluoro-o-toluamidePesticide ResiduesPyridinestebuconazoleTriazolesFluopyramMangoPersistencePesticide residuesPomegranateRisk assessmentTebuconazole

Identifiers

PMID35022971
OpenAlexW4205532347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.