Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35022929›Full record

Trial reportPituitary2022

Patient-reported outcomes in patients with acromegaly treated with pegvisomant in the ACROSTUDY extension: A real-world experience.

Roberto Salvatori, Pietro Maffei, Susan M Webb, Thierry Brue, Jane Loftus, Srinivas Rao Valluri, Roy Gomez, Michael P Wajnrajch, Maria Fleseriu

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pituitary, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The acromegaly patient experience: burden of treatment and quality of life.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Review
  2. Current treatment landscape of acromegaly.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Pegvisomant in managing comorbidities of acromegaly: a review.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Roberto SalvatoriDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism and Pituitary Center, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. salvator@jhmi.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6495-2244
Pietro MaffeiDepartment of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Susan M WebbDepartment of Endocrinology/Medicine, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras, Hospital Sant Pau, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Carrer de Sant Quintí 89, 08041, Barcelona, Spain.
Thierry BrueHopital de la Conception, and Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille Medical Genetics, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France.
Jane LoftusPfizer Ltd, Tadworth, UK.
Srinivas Rao Valluri, Pfizer, New York, NY, USA.
Roy GomezPfizer, Brussels, Belgium.
Michael P Wajnrajch, Pfizer, New York, NY, USA.
Maria FleseriuPituitary Center, Departments of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, & Clinical Nutrition) and Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Pfizer (United States) · USAix-Marseille Université · FRJohns Hopkins University · USOregon Health & Science University · USUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

Pfizer NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo report the effects of pegvisomant (PEGV) treatment on patient-reported outcomes in acromegaly patients.

methodsWe conducted an extension study of an open-label, multinational, non-interventional study (ACROSTUDY) evaluating the long-term safety and efficacy of PEGV for acromegaly in routine clinical practice. Enrolled patients were rollover patients from ACROSTUDY, or treatment naïve/semi-naïve (NSN; no PEGV within 6 months of enrollment). Exploratory efficacy endpoints were changes in symptoms with the Patient-Assessed Acromegaly Symptom Questionnaire (PASQ) and quality of life with the Acromegaly Quality of Life questionnaire (AcroQoL) analyzed by controlled or uncontrolled IGF-I levels. Results were analyzed in all patients, in NSN patient subgroup, and by diabetes status.

resultsA total of 544 patients with acromegaly were enrolled, including 434 rollover subjects from ACROSTUDY and 110 NSN patients. Mean PEGV treatment duration was 7.8 years (range, 0-19.6 years). Overall, the majority of PASQ scores improved over time, but there was no significant difference between IGF-I controlled or uncontrolled groups. In the NSN subgroup, most PASQ and AcroQoL scores remained similar to baseline up to 1 year, regardless of IGF-I control. Patients with diabetes reported better PASQ scores over time with PEGV treatment, regardless of IGF-I control. IGF-I normalization increased from 10% of patients at baseline to more than 78% at year 10, with a mean daily PEGV dose of 18.7 mg.

conclusionsOverall, patients treated with PEGV had small improvements in PASQ. While IGF-I normalization increased with PEGV treatment, IGF-I control had no effects on PASQ and AcroQoL scores.

Indexed as

AcromegalyHuman Growth HormoneHumansInsulin-Like Growth Factor IPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeHuman Growth HormoneInsulin-Like Growth Factor IpegvisomantAcromegalyACROSTUDYPatient-reported outcomesPegvisomant

Identifiers

PMID35022929
OpenAlexW4205401280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.