Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35022924›Full record

SynthesisJournal of digital imaging2022

Systematic Review of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) for Medical Image Classification and Segmentation.

Jiwoong J Jeong, Amara Tariq, Tobiloba Adejumo, Hari Trivedi, Judy W Gichoya, Imon Banerjee

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of digital imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiwoong J JeongDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, USA. jjeong35@asu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5630-9443
Amara TariqDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, USA.
Tobiloba AdejumoDepartment of Radiology, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, USA.
Hari TrivediDepartment of Radiology, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, USA.
Judy W GichoyaDepartment of Radiology, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, USA.
Imon BanerjeeDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, generative adversarial networks (GANs) have gained tremendous popularity for various imaging related tasks such as artificial image generation to support AI training. GANs are especially useful for medical imaging-related tasks where training datasets are usually limited in size and heavily imbalanced against the diseased class. We present a systematic review, following the PRISMA guidelines, of recent GAN architectures used for medical image analysis to help the readers in making an informed decision before employing GANs in developing medical image classification and segmentation models. We have extracted 54 papers that highlight the capabilities and application of GANs in medical imaging from January 2015 to August 2020 and inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. Our results show four main architectures of GAN that are used for segmentation or classification in medical imaging. We provide a comprehensive overview of recent trends in the application of GANs in clinical diagnosis through medical image segmentation and classification and ultimately share experiences for task-based GAN implementations.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerHumansGenerative adversarial networksImage classificationImage generationImage segmentationMedical imaging

Identifiers

PMID35022924
PMCPMC8921387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.