ReviewPediatric radiology2022
Quantitative renal magnetic resonance imaging: magnetic resonance urography.
Review in Pediatric radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prediction of split renal function and obstruction with magnetic resonance urography in comparison with dynamic renal scintigraphy.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Article
- Pediatric magnetic resonance urography from patient preparation to post-processing: basics and controversies.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI versus MAG-3 scintigraphy for differential renal function assessment in pediatric patients.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of novel cardiovascular magnetic resonance transit times beyond the pulmonary circulation in patients with ventricular dysfunction.European radiology · 2025Article
- Motion-compensated image reconstruction for improved kidney function assessment using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.NMR in biomedicine · 2024Article
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Clinical Trials of Diabetic Kidney Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Functional Magnetic Resonance Urography in Children-Tips and Pitfalls.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The goal of functional renal imaging is to identify and quantitate irreversible renal damage and nephron loss, as well as potentially reversible hemodynamic changes. MR urography has evolved into a comprehensive evaluation of the urinary tract that combines anatomical imaging with functional evaluation in a single test without ionizing radiation. Quantitative functional MR imaging is based on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR acquisitions that provide progressive, visible enhancement of the renal parenchyma and urinary tract. The signal changes related to perfusion, concentration and excretion of the contrast agent can be evaluated using both quantitative and qualitative measures. Functional evaluation with MR has continued to improve as a result of significant technical advances allowing for faster image acquisition as well as the development of new tracer kinetic models of renal function. The most common indications for MR urography in children are the evaluation of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract including hydronephrosis and renal malformations, and the identification of ectopic ureters in children with incontinence. In this paper, we review the underlying acquisition schemes and techniques used to generate quantitative functional parameters including the differential renal function (DRF), asymmetry index, mean transit time (MTT), signal intensity versus time curves as well as the calculation of individual kidney glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Visual inspection and semi-quantitative assessment using the renal transit time (RTT) and calyceal transit times (CTT) are fundamental to accurate diagnosis and are used as a basis for the interpretation of the quantitative data. The importance of visual assessment of the images cannot be overstated when analyzing the quantitative measures of renal function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.