Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35022833›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2022

Leiomyosarcoma of inferior vena cava (IVC): do we really need to reconstruct IVC post resection? Single institution experience.

Mahesh Goel, Anand Mohan, Shraddha Patkar, Kunal Gala, Nitin Shetty, Suyash Kulkarni, Jayesh Dhareshwar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Large functional retroperitoneal paraganglioma: A surgical challenge.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mahesh Goel *GI & HPB Service, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Ernest Borges Marg, Parel, Mumbai, 400 012, India.
Anand Mohan *GI & HPB Service, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Ernest Borges Marg, Parel, Mumbai, 400 012, India.
Shraddha PatkarGI & HPB Service, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Ernest Borges Marg, Parel, Mumbai, 400 012, India. drshraddhapatkar@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8489-6825
Kunal GalaDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Nitin ShettyDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Suyash KulkarniDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Jayesh DhareshwarDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Homi Bhabha National Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInferior vena cava (IVC) leiomyosarcomas (LMS) are a rare group of retroperitoneal tumors. R0 surgical resection is the only curative modality of treatment. IVC resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma is a complex surgery with no definitive guidelines for reconstruction.

methodsRetrospective review of all patients who underwent surgical resection of primary leiomyosarcoma of the IVC requiring resection from 2010 to 2020 at our tertiary care center was performed.

resultsAmong 24 patients who required IVC resection for LMS, only 7 (29%) required reconstruction of IVC. According to Clavien-Dindo classification, there was one grade 3 or more morbidity and 1 post-operative mortality. Seventeen patients underwent R0 resection whereas 7 patients had R1 resection on final histopathology. At a median follow-up of 25 months (range 8-91 months), the median OS was 40 months with median DFS of 28 months. Two patients presented with local recurrence while 13 patients developed systemic recurrence on follow-up.

conclusionCareful preoperative multidisciplinary planning can make IVC resection without reconstruction feasible with acceptable perioperative morbidity, mortality, and oncological outcomes for IVC LMS.

Indexed as

LeiomyosarcomaRetroperitoneal NeoplasmsVascular NeoplasmsHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeVena Cava, InferiorInferior vena cava sarcomaReconstructionResection

Identifiers

PMID35022833
OpenAlexW4205911607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.