Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35022714›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2023

Nordic responses to covid-19 from a health promotion perspective.

Nicole Thualagant, Nina Simonsen, Anneli Sarvimäki, Bettina Stenbock-Hult, Helga S Olafsdottir, Elisabeth Fosse, Steffen Torp, Karin C Ringsberg, Ulla Forrinder, Per Tillgren

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nicole ThualagantResearch Centre in Health Promotion. Department of People and Technology, Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5197-8979
Nina SimonsenFolkhälsan Research Center, Public Health Research Program & University of Helsinki, Department of Public Health P.O. Box 211, FI-00251 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-1376-7588
Anneli SarvimäkiThe Age Institute Jämsänkatu 2 FIN-00520 Helsinki Finland.
Bettina Stenbock-HultArcada University of Applied Sciences, Helsinki, Finland.
Helga S OlafsdottirLandspitali- The National Univertisty Hospital of Iceland.
Elisabeth FosseDepartment of Health Promotion and Development, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Norway.
Steffen TorpDepartment of Health, Social and Welfare Studies, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Campus Vestfold, University of South-Eastern Norway.
Karin C RingsbergInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ulla ForrinderDepartment of Social Work and Psychology, University of Gävle, Sweden.
Per TillgrenSchool of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

On 30 January 2020, the disease covid-19 was declared by the World Health Organization to be an international threat to human health and on 11 March 2020, the outbreak was declared a pandemic. The aim of this study was to analyse policy strategies developed by the five Nordic countries during the first 3 months of the pandemic from a health promotion perspective in order to identify Nordic responses to the crisis. Although the Nordic countries have a long tradition of co-operation as well as similar social welfare policies and legislation, each country developed their own strategies towards the crisis. The strategies identified were analysed from a health promotion perspective emanating from five principles: intersectorality, sustainability, equity, empowerment and a lifecourse perspective. Denmark, Finland and Norway had lockdowns to varying degrees, whereas Sweden and Iceland had no lockdowns. Iceland implemented a test and tracking strategy from the very beginning. All countries based their recommendations and restrictions on appeals to solidarity and trust in institutions and fellow citizens. The analysis showed that the strategies in all countries could be related to health promotion principles with some differences between the countries especially regarding equity and sustainability. The Nordic governments took responsibility for protecting their citizens by developing policy strategies based on restrictions and recommendations congruent with the principles of health promotion. The findings also identified issues that will pose challenges for future pandemic strategies.

Indexed as

COVID-19Communicable Disease ControlFinlandHealth PromotionHumansPublic PolicyScandinavian and Nordic Countriescovid-19health promotionNordic countriespolicy strategies

Identifiers

PMID35022714
PMCPMC8807276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.