Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35022662›Full record

ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2022

Hyperresponsive cytosolic DNA-sensing pathway in monocytes from primary Sjögren's syndrome.

Erika Huijser, Iris L A Bodewes, Mirthe S Lourens, Cornelia G van Helden-Meeuwsen, Thierry P P van den Bosch, Dwin G B Grashof, Harmen J G van de Werken, Ana P Lopes, Joel A G van Roon, Paul L A van Daele and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Dysregulated CaeLife · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Dysregulated CabioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Erika HuijserDepartment of Immunology.
Iris L A BodewesDepartment of Immunology.
Mirthe S LourensDepartment of Immunology.
Cornelia G van Helden-MeeuwsenDepartment of Immunology.
Thierry P P van den BoschDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC.
Dwin G B GrashofDepartment of Immunology.ORCID 0000-0002-4169-9888
Harmen J G van de WerkenDepartment of Immunology.ORCID 0000-0002-9794-1477
Ana P LopesDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology.
Joel A G van RoonDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology.
Paul L A van DaeleDepartment of Immunology.
Zana BrkicDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.
Willem A DikLaboratory Medical Immunology, Department of Immunology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marjan A VersnelDepartment of Immunology.ORCID 0000-0003-0245-5386
Erasmus MC · NLUtrecht University · NLErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCytosolic DNA-sensing pathway stimulation prompts type I IFN (IFN-I) production, but its role in systemic IFN-I pathway activation in primary SS (pSS) is poorly studied. Here we investigate the responsiveness of pSS monocytes and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) to stimulator of interferon genes (STING) activation in relation to systemic IFN-I pathway activation and compare this with SLE.

methodsExpression of DNA-sensing receptors cGAS, IFI16, ZBP-1 and DDX41, signalling molecules STING, TBK1 and IRF3, positive and negative STING regulators, and IFN-I-stimulated genes MxA, IFI44, IFI44L, IFIT1 and IFIT3 was analysed in whole blood, CD14+ monocytes, pDCs, and salivary glands by RT-PCR, monocyte RNA sequencing data, flow cytometry and immunohistochemical staining. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from pSS, SLE and healthy controls (HCs) were stimulated with STING agonist 2'3'-cGAMP. STING phosphorylation (pSTING) and intracellular IFNα were evaluated using flow cytometry.

resultsSTING activation induced a significantly higher proportion of IFNα-producing monocytes, but not pDCs, in both IFN-low and IFN-high pSS compared with HC PBMCs. Additionally, a trend towards more pSTING+ monocytes was observed in pSS and SLE, most pronounced in IFN-high patients. Positive STING regulators TRIM38, TRIM56, USP18 and SENP7 were significantly higher expression in pSS than HC monocytes, while the dual-function STING regulator RNF26 was downregulated in pSS monocytes. STING was expressed in mononuclear infiltrates and ductal epithelium in pSS salivary glands. STING stimulation induced pSTING and IFNα in pSS and SLE pDCs.

conclusionpSS monocytes and pDCs are hyperresponsive to stimulation of the STING pathway, which was not restricted to patients with IFN-I pathway activation.

Indexed as

Interferon Type ILupus Erythematosus, SystemicSjogren's SyndromeDNAHumansInterferon-alphaLeukocytes, MononuclearMonocytesNeoplasm ProteinsTripartite Motif ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesUbiquitin ThiolesteraseDNAInterferon-alphaInterferon Type INeoplasm ProteinsRNF26 protein, humanTRIM56 protein, humanTripartite Motif ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesUbiquitin ThiolesteraseUSP18 protein, humanDNA-sensing pathwaymonocytesSjögren’s syndromeSTINGtype I IFN

Identifiers

PMID35022662
PMCPMC9348764
OpenAlexW4205308566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.