Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35022619›Full record

ReviewNature protocols2022

Routine culture and study of adult human brain cells from neurosurgical specimens.

Thomas I-H Park, Leon C D Smyth, Miranda Aalderink, Zoe R Woolf, Justin Rustenhoven, Kevin Lee, Deidre Jansson, Amy Smith, Sheryl Feng, Jason Correia and 4 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. CulturedBrain communications · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Common AAV gene therapy vectors show nonselective transduction ofMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Isolation of Primary Brain Cells: Challenges and Solutions.Archives of clinical and biomedical research · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. β-Estradiol 17-acetate enhances theNeural regeneration research · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas I-H ParkHugh Green Biobank & Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Leon C D SmythCentre for Free Radical Research, Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9861-3574
Miranda AalderinkHugh Green Biobank & Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Zoe R WoolfHugh Green Biobank & Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Justin RustenhovenCenter for Brain Immunology and Glia (BIG), Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Kevin LeeDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medical Science and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Deidre JanssonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine VISN 20 Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Centre (MIRECC), VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.
Amy SmithHugh Green Biobank & Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Sheryl FengHugh Green Biobank & Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Jason CorreiaNeurosurgical Research Unit, Centre for Brain Research, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Peter HeppnerNeurosurgical Research Unit, Centre for Brain Research, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Patrick SchwederNeurosurgical Research Unit, Centre for Brain Research, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Edward MeeNeurosurgical Research Unit, Centre for Brain Research, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Mike DragunowHugh Green Biobank & Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. m.dragunow@auckland.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1711-1631
University of Auckland · NZUniversity of Otago · NZUniversity of Washington · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When modeling disease in the laboratory, it is important to use clinically relevant models. Patient-derived human brain cells grown in vitro to study and test potential treatments provide such a model. Here, we present simple, highly reproducible coordinated procedures that can be used to routinely culture most cell types found in the human brain from single neurosurgically excised brain specimens. The cell types that can be cultured include dissociated cultures of neurons, astrocytes, microglia, pericytes and brain endothelial and neural precursor cells, as well as explant cultures of the leptomeninges, cortical slice cultures and brain tumor cells. The initial setup of cultures takes ~2 h, and the cells are ready for further experiments within days to weeks. The resulting cells can be studied as purified or mixed population cultures, slice cultures and explant-derived cultures. This protocol therefore enables the investigation of human brain cells to facilitate translation of neuroscience research to the clinic.

Indexed as

BrainCell Culture TechniquesAdultCells, CulturedHumansNeuronsNeurosurgical Procedures

Identifiers

PMID35022619
OpenAlexW4205837091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.