Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35022447›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Dynamic targeting enables domain-general inhibitory control over action and thought by the prefrontal cortex.

Dace Apšvalka, Catarina S Ferreira, Taylor W Schmitz, James B Rowe, Michael C Anderson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Psychotherapy and inhibitory control: Insights from fMRI research.Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Prefrontal and Cerebellar Contributions to Semantic Memory Retrieval.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Maintenance suppression enhances subsequent associative learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Memory control deficits in the sleep-deprived human brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Dace Apšvalka *MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK. dace.apsvalka@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5618-8108
Catarina S Ferreira *School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3858-8113
Taylor W SchmitzDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, N6A 5B7, Canada.
James B RoweMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7216-8679
Michael C AndersonMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK. michael.anderson@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9505-9299
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBWestern University · CA

Funding

Medical Research Council MC-A060-5PR00Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/12Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/14Medical Research Council SUAG051/101400Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 103838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last two decades, inhibitory control has featured prominently in accounts of how humans and other organisms regulate their behaviour and thought. Previous work on how the brain stops actions and thoughts, however, has emphasised distinct prefrontal regions supporting these functions, suggesting domain-specific mechanisms. Here we show that stopping actions and thoughts recruits common regions in the right dorsolateral and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex to suppress diverse content, via dynamic targeting. Within each region, classifiers trained to distinguish action-stopping from action-execution also identify when people are suppressing their thoughts (and vice versa). Effective connectivity analysis reveals that both prefrontal regions contribute to action and thought stopping by targeting the motor cortex or the hippocampus, depending on the goal, to suppress their task-specific activity. These findings support the existence of a domain-general system that underlies inhibitory control and establish Dynamic Targeting as a mechanism enabling this ability.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHippocampusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemoryMotor CortexPrefrontal CortexPsychomotor PerformanceYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID35022447
PMCPMC8755760
OpenAlexW4226060132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.