Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35022445›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Analysis of non-pharmaceutical interventions and their impacts on COVID-19 in Kerala.

Elizabeth Goult, Shubha Sathyendranath, Žarko Kovač, Christina Eunjin Kong, Petar Stipanović, Anas Abdulaziz, Nandini Menon, Grinson George, Trevor Platt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elizabeth GoultPlymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, UK.
Shubha SathyendranathPlymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, UK. ssat@pml.ac.uk.
Žarko KovačUniversity of Split, Faculty of Science, Split, Croatia.
Christina Eunjin KongPlymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, UK.
Petar StipanovićUniversity of Split, Faculty of Science, Split, Croatia.
Anas AbdulazizCSIR National Institute of Oceanography, Kochi, India.
Nandini MenonNansen Environmental Research Centre - India, Kochi, India.
Grinson GeorgeICAR Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi, India.
Trevor PlattPlymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, UK.

Funding

Natural Environment Research Council REVIVAL
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the absence of an effective vaccine or drug therapy, non-pharmaceutical interventions are the only option for control of the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019, a pandemic with global implications. Each of the over 200 countries affected has followed its own path in dealing with the crisis, making it difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of measures implemented, either individually, or collectively. In this paper we analyse the case of the south Indian state of Kerala, which received much attention in the international media for its actions in containing the spread of the disease in the early months of the pandemic, but later succumbed to a second wave. We use a model to study the trajectory of the disease in the state during the first four months of the outbreak. We then use the model for a retrospective analysis of measures taken to combat the spread of the disease, to evaluate their impact. Because of the differences in the trajectory of the outbreak in Kerala, we argue that it is a model worthy of a place in the discussion on how the world might best handle this and other, future, pandemics.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationCOVID-19Disease OutbreaksHumansIndiaModels, BiologicalQuarantine

Identifiers

PMID35022445
PMCPMC8755744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.