ArticleScientific reports2022
Diagnostic value of
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodality staging of renal cell carcinoma-pearls & pitfalls.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- When Cancer Clots: An Extensive Radiologic Analysis of Cancer-Associated Thromboembolism.Cancers · 2026Review
- Head-to-head comparison ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Review
- High-grade leiomyosarcoma of the common femoral vein masquerading as a femoral artery aneurysm in an elderly patient: A diagnostic challenge.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Mesorectal thromboembolism with increasedJournal of surgical case reports · 2024Article
- A rare combination: thrombotic and non-thrombotic pulmonary embolism.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2023Article
- Diagnostic performance and prognostic value of preoperativeCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the ability of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.