Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35022378›Full record

ArticleNuclear medicine communications2022

Impact on the long-term prognosis of FDG PET/CT in luminal-A and luminal-B breast cancer.

Luca Urso, Natale Quartuccio, Matteo Caracciolo, Laura Evangelista, Alessio Schirone, Antonio Frassoldati, Gaspare Arnone, Stefano Panareo, Mirco Bartolomei

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nuclear medicine communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The impact of PET imaging on triple negative breast cancer: an updated evidence-based perspective.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Cancers · 2025
    Review
  9. La Radiologia medica · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Comparison of MRI vs. [Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  13. Cancers · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Luca UrsoOncological Medical and Specialists Department, Nuclear Medicine Unit, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara.
Natale QuartuccioNuclear Medicine Unit, A.R.N.A.S. Ospedali Civico, Di Cristina e Benfratelli, Palermo.
Matteo CaraccioloOncological Medical and Specialists Department, Nuclear Medicine Unit, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara.
Laura EvangelistaDepartment of Medicine DIMED, Nuclear Medicine Unit, University of Padova, Padova.
Alessio SchironeOncological Medical and Specialists Department, Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Antonio FrassoldatiOncological Medical and Specialists Department, Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Gaspare ArnoneNuclear Medicine Unit, A.R.N.A.S. Ospedali Civico, Di Cristina e Benfratelli, Palermo.
Stefano PanareoOncological Medical and Specialists Department, Nuclear Medicine Unit, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara.
Mirco BartolomeiOncological Medical and Specialists Department, Nuclear Medicine Unit, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara.
University of Ferrara · ITAzienda di Rilievo Nazionale ed Alta Specializzazione · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of the present study was to explore the prognostic role of 2- deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose PET (FDG PET)/CT in recurrent luminal A and luminal B breast cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsFrom two institutional databases, we retrospectively retrieved data about breast cancer patients undergoing FDG PET/CT between 2011 and 2018 for the assessment of recurrency. Molecular subtypes of breast cancer were defined based on the expression of estrogen, progesterone, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-b receptors and proliferation index. Overall survival (OS, intended as the time from PET/CT and the time of death) was registered for each patient, by checking the medical charts. Parametric and survival analyses were computed.

resultsData of 179 patients were retrieved. Sixty-three patients had luminal A, 88 luminal B and 28 luminal B/He breast cancer. At the time of PET/CT scan, cancer antigen (CA) 15.3 levels was within the normal range in 119 patients, whereas it was increased in 60 patients. FDG PET/CT results were suggestive for disease recurrence in 114 (63.7%) patients. The median time lapse from the FDG PET/CT scan to the last clinical follow-up visit was 51 months (1-192 months). Patients with evidence of a PET/CT scan suggestive for disease recurrence showed a significantly shorter OS (P < 0.001) compared to patients with no PET/CT evidence of recurrence, in each subset of luminal breast cancer. Moreover, PET/CT was able to stratify the prognosis of patients independently from the level of tumor marker.

conclusionThese data suggest that FDG PET/CT may be an attractive prognostic tool in recurrent breast cancer. Our study supports its prognostic role both in luminal A and B-type molecular subtypes, regardless of the CA 15.3 levels.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFluorodeoxyglucose F18Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPrognosisRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsFluorodeoxyglucose F18

Identifiers

PMID35022378
PMCPMC10876173
OpenAlexW3206660661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.