Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35022327›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2022

Stopping Interference in Response Inhibition: Behavioral and Neural Signatures of Selective Stopping.

Corey G Wadsley, John Cirillo, Arne Nieuwenhuys, Winston D Byblow

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Stopping Muscle Contractions and Relaxations during Action Inhibition Involves Global and Targeted Control Dependent on Muscle State.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Proactive Interhemispheric Disinhibition Supports Response Preparation during Selective Stopping.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Corey G WadsleyMovement Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Exercise Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-0416-4646
John CirilloMovement Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Exercise Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.
Arne NieuwenhuysMovement Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Exercise Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-2897-5814
Winston D ByblowMovement Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Exercise Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand w.byblow@auckland.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0001-8347-6730

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Response inhibition is an essential aspect of cognitive control that is necessary for terminating inappropriate preplanned or ongoing responses. Response-selective stopping represents a complex form of response inhibition where only a subcomponent of a multicomponent action must be terminated. In this context, a substantial response delay emerges on unstopped effectors after the cued effector is successfully stopped. This response delay has been termed the stopping interference effect. Converging lines of evidence indicate that this effect results from a global response inhibition mechanism that is recruited regardless of the stopping context. However, behavioral observations reveal that the stopping interference effect may not always occur during selective stopping. This review summarizes the behavioral and neural signatures of response inhibition during selective stopping. An overview of selective stopping contexts and the stopping interference effect is provided. A "restart" model of selective stopping is expanded on in light of recent neurophysiological evidence of selective and nonselective response inhibition. Factors beyond overt action cancellation that contribute to the stopping interference effect are discussed. Finally, a pause-then-cancel model of action stopping is presented as a candidate framework to understand stopping interference during response-selective stopping. The extant literature indicates that stopping interference may result from both selective and nonselective response inhibition processes, which can be amplified or attenuated by response conflict, task familiarity, and functional coupling.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalElectroencephalographyHumansMotor CortexNeural InhibitionPsychomotor PerformanceReaction Time

Identifiers

PMID35022327
PMCPMC8802939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.