Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35022323›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2022

Validation of Anticorrelated TGFβ Signaling and Alternative End-Joining DNA Repair Signatures that Predict Response to Genotoxic Cancer Therapy.

Ines Guix, Qi Liu, Miquel Angel Pujana, Patrick Ha, Josep Piulats, Isabel Linares, Ferran Guedea, Jian-Hua Mao, Ann Lazar, Jocelyn Chapman and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Molecular Pathways and Mechanisms of TGFβ in Cancer Therapy.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ines GuixDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Qi LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Miquel Angel PujanaProCURE, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Oncobell, Bellvitge institute for Biomedical Research, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3222-4044
Patrick HaDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery and Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Josep PiulatsProCURE, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Oncobell, Bellvitge institute for Biomedical Research, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Isabel LinaresRadiobiology and Cancer Group, Oncobell, Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6205-3859
Ferran GuedeaRadiobiology and Cancer Group, Oncobell, Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Jian-Hua MaoLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California.ORCID 0000-0001-9320-6021
Ann LazarDivision of Oral Epidemiology and Dental Public Health, University of California, San Francisco, California.
Jocelyn ChapmanHelen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0002-4260-3016
Sue S YomDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0002-0779-7476
Alan AshworthHelen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Mary Helen Barcellos-HoffDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0002-5994-9558
University of California, San Francisco · USBellvitge University Hospital · ESUCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center · USLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · US

Funding

Translational InformaticsP30CA082103 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Kate Taylor Shumate · 1999 to 2026
$209.7M
Definition of Immune Infiltrate Phenotype and DNA Damage Response Deficits Across Diverse Murine Mammary CarcinomasR01CA239235 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BARCELLOS-HOFF, MARY HELEN · 2019 to 2023
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA082103NCI NIH HHS R01 CA239235
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLoss of TGFβ signaling increases error-prone alternative end-joining (alt-EJ) DNA repair. We previously translated this mechanistic relationship as TGFβ and alt-EJ gene expression signatures, which we showed are anticorrelated across cancer types. A score representing anticorrelation, βAlt, predicts patient outcome in response to genotoxic therapy. Here we sought to verify this biology in live specimens and additional datasets. EXPERIMENTAL

designHuman head and neck squamous carcinoma (HNSC) explants were treated in vitro to test whether the signatures report TGFβ signaling, indicated by SMAD2 phosphorylation, and unrepaired DNA damage, indicated by persistent 53BP1 foci after irradiation or olaparib. A custom NanoString assay was implemented to analyze the signatures' expression in explants. Each signature gene was then weighted by its association with functional responses to define a modified score, βAltw, that was retested for association with response to genotoxic therapies in independent datasets.

resultsMost genes in each signature were positively correlated with the expected biological response in tumor explants. Anticorrelation of TGFβ and alt-EJ signatures measured by NanoString was confirmed in explants. βAltw was significantly (P < 0.001) better than βAlt in predicting overall survival in response to genotoxic therapy in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) pancancer patients and in independent HNSC and ovarian cancer patient datasets.

conclusionsAssociation of the TGFβ and alt-EJ signatures with their biological response validates TGFβ competency as a key mediator of DNA repair that can be readily assayed by gene expression. The predictive value of βAltw supports its development to assist in clinical decision making.

Indexed as

DNA End-Joining RepairHead and Neck NeoplasmsDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA DamageDNA RepairHumansSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckTransforming Growth Factor betaTransforming Growth Factor beta

Identifiers

PMID35022323
PMCPMC8976728
OpenAlexW4205717625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.