Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35022172›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2022

Twelve-month prevalence of haemarthrosis and joint disease using the Haemophilia Joint Health score: evaluation of the UK National Haemophilia Database and Haemtrack patient reported data: an observational study.

Richard A Wilkins, David Stephensen, Heidi Siddle, Martin J Scott, Hua Xiang, Elizabeth Horn, Ben Palmer, Graham J Chapman, Michael Richards, Rebecca Walwyn and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Richard A WilkinsLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK r.a.wilkins@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1885-5472
David StephensenHaemophilia Centre, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6175-3343
Heidi SiddleLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Martin J ScottUniversity Department of Clinical Haematology, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK.
Hua XiangNational Haemophilia Database, United Kingdom Haemophilia Centre Doctors' Organisation (UKHCDO), Manchester, UK.
Elizabeth HornLeeds Haemophilia Comprehensive Care Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Ben PalmerNational Haemophilia Database, United Kingdom Haemophilia Centre Doctors' Organisation (UKHCDO), Manchester, UK.
Graham J ChapmanSchool of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
Michael RichardsLeeds Haemophilia Comprehensive Care Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Rebecca WalwynClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Anthony RedmondNIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBHaemophilia Foundation Australia · AUBarts Health NHS Trust · GBManchester Royal Infirmary · GBUniversity of Lancashire · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo report the 12-month prevalence of joint bleeds from the National Haemophilia Database (NHD) and Haemtrack, a patient-reported online treatment diary and concurrent joint disease status using the haemophilia joint health score (HJHS) at individual joint level, in children and adults with severe haemophilia A and B (HA/HB) without a current inhibitor.

designA 2018 retrospective database study of NHD from which 2238 cases were identified, 463 patients had fully itemised HJHS of whom 273 were compliant in recording treatment using Haemtrack.

settingEngland, Wales and Scotland, UK.

participantsChildren (<18 years) and adults (≥18 years) with severe HA and HB (factor VIII/factor IX, <0.01 iu/mL) without a current inhibitor. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Prevalence of joint haemarthrosis and concurrent joint health measured using the HJHS.

resultsThe median (IQR) age of children was 10 (6-13) and adults 40 (29-50) years. Haemarthrosis prevalence in HA/HB children was 33% and 47%, respectively, and 60% and 42%, respectively, in adults. The most common site of haemarthrosis in children was the knee in HA and ankle in HB. In adults, the incidence of haemarthrosis at the ankles and elbows was equal. The median total HJHS in HA/HB children was 0 and in adults with HA/HB, were 18 and 11, respectively. In adults with HA/HB, the median ankle HJHS of 4.0 was higher than the median HJHS of 1.0 for both the knee and elbow.

conclusionDespite therapeutic advances, only two-thirds of children and one-third of adults were bleed-free, even in a UK cohort selected for high compliance with prophylaxis. The median HJHS of zero in children suggests joint health is relatively unaffected during childhood. In adults, bleed rates were highest in ankles and elbows, but the ankles led to substantially worse joint health scores.

Indexed as

Hemophilia AAdultChildHemarthrosisHumansMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesUnited Kingdombleeding disorders & coagulopathiesfoot & anklemusculoskeletal disorders

Identifiers

PMID35022172
PMCPMC8756269
OpenAlexW4206506774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.