Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35022109›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2022

Improving the Quality of EDTA-treated Blood Specimens from Mice.

Catherine J Layssol-Lamour, Fanny A Granat, Ambrine M Sahal, Jean-Pierre D Braun, Catherine Trumel, Nathalie H Bourgès-Abella

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Catherine J Layssol-LamourCentre Régional d'Exploration Fonctionnelle et de Ressources Expérimentales (CREFRE), Université de Toulouse, UMR 1037,INSERM, UPS, ENVT.
Fanny A GranatCentre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse, INSE=RM, Université de Toulouse.
Ambrine M SahalCentre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse, INSE=RM, Université de Toulouse.
Jean-Pierre D BraunAnimal and Comparative Clinical Pathology, Toulouse, France.
Catherine TrumelCentre Régional d'Exploration Fonctionnelle et de Ressources Expérimentales (CREFRE), Université de Toulouse, UMR 1037,INSERM, UPS, ENVT.
Nathalie H Bourgès-AbellaCentre Régional d'Exploration Fonctionnelle et de Ressources Expérimentales (CREFRE), Université de Toulouse, UMR 1037,INSERM, UPS, ENVT.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonterminal blood sampling in laboratory mice is a very common procedure. With the goal of improving animal welfare, different sampling sites and methods have been compared but have not achieved a consensus. Moreover, most of these studies overlooked the quality of blood specimens collected. The main preanalytical concern with EDTA-treated blood specimens for hematology analyses is platelet aggregation, which is known to cause analytical errors. Our objective was to find a nonterminal blood sampling method with minimal adverse effects on mice and few or no platelet aggregates. We tested and compared 2 collection sites, 4 sampling methods, and 3 antithrombotic drugs in 80 C57BL6/j male and female mice by evaluating platelet aggregates on blood smears and platelet, WBC, and RBC counts. In addition, the blood collection process was carefully evaluated, and adverse effects were recorded. Platelet aggregation was lower in specimens collected from the jugular vein than from the facial vein, with no effect of the sampling device or the presence of an antithrombotic additive. Highly aggregated specimens were significantly associated with lower platelet counts, whereas aggregation had no effect on WBC or RBC counts. Adverse events during sampling were significantly associated with more numerous platelet aggregates. The jugular vein is thus a satisfactory sampling site in mice in terms of both animal welfare and low platelet aggregation. Using antithrombotic agents appears to be unnecessary, whereas improving sampling conditions remains a key requirement to ensure the quality of EDTA-treated blood specimens from mice.

Indexed as

Blood PlateletsPlatelet AggregationAnimalsEdetic AcidFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPlatelet CountEdetic Acid

Identifiers

PMID35022109
PMCPMC8956217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.