Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35022044›Full record

ArticleEmerging themes in epidemiology2022

Implementing effective community-based surveillance in research studies of maternal, newborn and infant outcomes in low resource settings.

Caitlin Shannon, Chris Hurt, Seyi Soremekun, Karen Edmond, Sam Newton, Seeba Amenga-Etego, Charlotte Tawiah-Agyemang, Zelee Hill, Alexander Manu, Ben Weobong and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging themes in epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Caitlin ShannonImpact and Innovation Team, CARE USA, 115 Broadway, 5th Floor, New York, NY, 10006, USA.
Chris HurtCentre for Trials Research, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.
Seyi SoremekunMaternal and Child Health Intervention Research Group, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Karen EdmondDepartment of Women and Children's Health, Kings College London, Strand, London, WC2R 2LS, UK.
Sam NewtonSchool of Public Health, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Seeba Amenga-EtegoKintampo Health Research Centre, Ghana Health Service, Kintampo, Bono East and Bono Regions, Ghana.
Charlotte Tawiah-AgyemangKintampo Health Research Centre, Ghana Health Service, Kintampo, Bono East and Bono Regions, Ghana.
Zelee HillInstitute for Global Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
Alexander ManuDepartment of Epidemiology and Disease Control, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Legon, P.O. Box LG 25, Accra, Ghana.
Ben WeobongDepartment of Social and Behavioural Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Betty Kirkwood *Maternal and Child Health Intervention Research Group, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Lisa Hurt *Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK. hurtl@cardiff.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2741-5383

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1138582Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPPGH5297
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobally adopted health and development milestones have not only encouraged improvements in the health and wellbeing of women and infants worldwide, but also a better understanding of the epidemiology of key outcomes and the development of effective interventions in these vulnerable groups. Monitoring of maternal and child health outcomes for milestone tracking requires the collection of good quality data over the long term, which can be particularly challenging in poorly-resourced settings. Despite the wealth of general advice on conducting field trials, there is a lack of specific guidance on designing and implementing studies on mothers and infants. Additional considerations are required when establishing surveillance systems to capture real-time information at scale on pregnancies, pregnancy outcomes, and maternal and infant health outcomes. MAIN BODY: Based on two decades of collaborative research experience between the Kintampo Health Research Centre in Ghana and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, we propose a checklist of key items to consider when designing and implementing systems for pregnancy surveillance and the identification and classification of maternal and infant outcomes in research studies. These are summarised under four key headings: understanding your population; planning data collection cycles; enhancing routine surveillance with additional data collection methods; and designing data collection and management systems that are adaptable in real-time.

conclusionHigh-quality population-based research studies in low resource communities are essential to ensure continued improvement in health metrics and a reduction in inequalities in maternal and infant outcomes. We hope that the lessons learnt described in this paper will help researchers when planning and implementing their studies.

Indexed as

CommunityInfantMaternalNeonatalPopulation-basedRandomised controlled trialsResearchSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID35022044
PMCPMC8756712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.