ArticleBMC medical imaging2022
Self-relabeling for noise-tolerant retina vessel segmentation through label reliability estimation.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRetinal vessel segmentation benefits significantly from deep learning. Its performance relies on sufficient training images with accurate ground-truth segmentation, which are usually manually annotated in the form of binary pixel-wise label maps. Manually annotated ground-truth label maps, more or less, contain errors for part of the pixels. Due to the thin structure of retina vessels, such errors are more frequent and serious in manual annotations, which negatively affect deep learning performance.
methodsIn this paper, we develop a new method to automatically and iteratively identify and correct such noisy segmentation labels in the process of network training. We consider historical predicted label maps of network-in-training from different epochs and jointly use them to self-supervise the predicted labels during training and dynamically correct the supervised labels with noises.
resultsWe conducted experiments on the three datasets of DRIVE, STARE and CHASE-DB1 with synthetic noises, pseudo-labeled noises, and manually labeled noises. For synthetic noise, the proposed method corrects the original noisy label maps to a more accurate label map by 4.0-[Formula: see text] on [Formula: see text] and 10.7-[Formula: see text] on PR on three testing datasets. For the other two types of noise, the method could also improve the label map quality.
conclusionsExperiment results verified that the proposed method could achieve better retinal image segmentation performance than many existing methods by simultaneously correcting the noise in the initial label map.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.