Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35021210›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2022

SpeciesRax: A Tool for Maximum Likelihood Species Tree Inference from Gene Family Trees under Duplication, Transfer, and Loss.

Benoit Morel, Paul Schade, Sarah Lutteropp, Tom A Williams, Gergely J Szöllősi, Alexandros Stamatakis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Insect Phylogenomics: From Experiment Planning to Post-phylogenetic Analyses.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Challenges in Assembling the Dated Tree of Life.Genome biology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Incongruence in the phylogenomics era.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Phylogenomic Testing of Root Hypotheses.Genome biology and evolution · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Recent progress on methods for estimating and updating large phylogenies.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Benoit MorelComputational Molecular Evolution Group, Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6286-4419
Paul SchadeInstitute for Theoretical Informatics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Sarah LutteroppComputational Molecular Evolution Group, Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies, Heidelberg, Germany.
Tom A WilliamsSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1072-0223
Gergely J SzöllősiELTE-MTA "Lendület" Evolutionary Genomics Research Group, Budapest, Hungary.
Alexandros StamatakisComputational Molecular Evolution Group, Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0353-0691
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology · DEEötvös Loránd University · HUHeidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies · DEUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Species tree inference from gene family trees is becoming increasingly popular because it can account for discordance between the species tree and the corresponding gene family trees. In particular, methods that can account for multiple-copy gene families exhibit potential to leverage paralogy as informative signal. At present, there does not exist any widely adopted inference method for this purpose. Here, we present SpeciesRax, the first maximum likelihood method that can infer a rooted species tree from a set of gene family trees and can account for gene duplication, loss, and transfer events. By explicitly modeling events by which gene trees can depart from the species tree, SpeciesRax leverages the phylogenetic rooting signal in gene trees. SpeciesRax infers species tree branch lengths in units of expected substitutions per site and branch support values via paralogy-aware quartets extracted from the gene family trees. Using both empirical and simulated data sets we show that SpeciesRax is at least as accurate as the best competing methods while being one order of magnitude faster on large data sets at the same time. We used SpeciesRax to infer a biologically plausible rooted phylogeny of the vertebrates comprising 188 species from 31,612 gene families in 1 h using 40 cores. SpeciesRax is available under GNU GPL at https://github.com/BenoitMorel/GeneRax and on BioConda.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGene DuplicationModels, GeneticPedigreePhylogenygene duplicationgene family treegene losshorizontal gene transfermaximum likelihoodspecies tree inference

Identifiers

PMID35021210
PMCPMC8826479
OpenAlexW4205175008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.