Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35021117›Full record

ArticleThe journal of pain2022

The Relationship Between Experienced Discrimination and Pronociceptive Processes in Native Americans: Results From the Oklahoma Study of Native American Pain Risk.

Yvette M Güereca, Parker A Kell, Bethany L Kuhn, Natalie Hellman, Cassandra A Sturycz, Tyler A Toledo, Felicitas A Huber, Mara Demuth, Edward W Lannon, Shreela Palit and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of pain, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yvette M GüerecaDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Parker A KellDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Bethany L KuhnDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Natalie HellmanDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Cassandra A SturyczDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Tyler A ToledoDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Felicitas A HuberDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Mara DemuthDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Edward W LannonDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Shreela PalitUniversity of Florida, Pain Research and Intervention Center of Excellence, Gainesville, Florida.
Joanna O ShadlowDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Jamie L RhudyDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, Oklahoma. Electronic address: jamie-rhudy@utulsa.edu.
University of Tulsa · USOklahoma State University at Tulsa · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Native American Pain Disparities: Exploring Nociceptive Processing DifferencesR01MD007807 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF TULSA · PI RHUDY, JAMIE LYNN · 2013 to 2016
$1.2M
NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD007807
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Native Americans (NAs) have higher pain rates than the general U.S. population. It has been found that increased central sensitization and reduced pain inhibition are pronociceptive processes that increase pain risk; yet, little attention has focused on the influence of psychosocial factors. Discrimination is a psychosocial factor associated with increased pain in other minoritized groups; however, it is unclear whether it also promotes pain in NAs. This study analyzed data from 269 healthy, pain-free participants (N = 134 non-Hispanic whites [NHWs], N = 135 NAs) from the Oklahoma Study of Native American Pain Risk. Experienced discrimination was measured using the Everyday Discrimination Scale (EDS). Nociceptive processes were measured via static measures of spinal sensitivity (nociceptive flexion reflex [NFR] threshold, 3-stimulation NFR threshold), temporal summation of pain (TS-Pain) and nociceptive flexion reflex (TS-NFR), and conditioned pain modulation of pain (CPM-Pain) and NFR (CPM-NFR). Results demonstrated that greater discrimination was associated with enhanced TS-NFR and impaired CPM-NFR but not static measures of spinal sensitivity or measures of pain modulation (TS-Pain, CPM-Pain). Although the effects of discrimination on outcomes were similar in both groups (not moderated by ethnicity), NAs experienced higher levels of discrimination and therefore discrimination mediated a relationship between ethnicity and impaired CPM-NFR. This indicates experienced discrimination may promote a pain risk phenotype in NAs that involves spinal sensitization resulting from impaired inhibition of spinal nociception without sensitization of pain experience. PERSPECTIVE: This study found that discrimination was associated with spinal sensitization and impaired descending inhibition of spinal nociception. These findings bolster our understanding of how social stressors experienced disproportionately by minoritized groups can contribute to pain outcomes.

Indexed as

PainPain ThresholdAmerican Indian or Alaska NativeHumansNociceptionOklahomaPain MeasurementReflexCentral sensitizationconditioned pain modulationdescending inhibitiondiscriminationethnic differencesNative Americanstemporal summation

Identifiers

PMID35021117
PMCPMC9232892
OpenAlexW4206024686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.