Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35020840›Full record

Observational studyClinical and experimental immunology2022

Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and treated with anakinra: a real-world study in the USA.

Carly Rich, Daniel Eriksson, Fabrizio Dolfi, Katarzyna Jablonska, Firas Dabbous, Jameel Nazir

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical and experimental immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05611710 (Anakinra for Dengue Patients With Hyperinflammation - a Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05611710 phase2active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Anakinra for Dengue Patients With Hyperinflammation - a Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorOxford University Clinical Research Unit, VietnamRan2023 to 2027Enrolled160ConditionsDengue, Dengue With Warning Signs, Severe Dengue, AnakinraArmsPlacebo, Anakinra
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dengue and severe dengue.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carly RichSwedish Orphan Biovitrum AB, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4717-5855
Daniel ErikssonSwedish Orphan Biovitrum AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
Fabrizio DolfiSwedish Orphan Biovitrum AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
Katarzyna JablonskaCreativ-Ceutical, Kraków, Poland.
Firas DabbousCreativ-Ceutical, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jameel NazirSwedish Orphan Biovitrum AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
Swedish Orphan Biovitrum (Sweden) · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anakinra, a recombinant, non-glycosylated human interleukin (IL)-1 receptor antagonist, has been used in real-world clinical practice to manage hyperinflammation in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This retrospective, observational study analyses US hospital inpatient data of patients diagnosed with moderate/severe COVID-19 and treated with anakinra between 1 April and 31 August 2020. Of the 119 patients included in the analysis, 63.9% were male, 48.6% were of black ethnicity, and the mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 64.7 (12.5) years. Mean (SD) time from hospital admission to anakinra initiation was 7.3 (6.1) days. Following anakinra initiation, 73.1% of patients received antibiotics, 55.5% received antithrombotics, and 91.0% received corticosteroids. Overall, 64.7% of patients required intensive care unit (ICU) admittance, and 28.6% received mechanical ventilation following admission. Patients who did not require ICU admittance or who were discharged alive experienced a significantly shorter time between hospital admission and receiving anakinra treatment compared with those admitted to the ICU (5 vs. 8 days; P = 0.002) or those who died in hospital (6 vs. 9 days; P = 0.01). Patients with myocardial infarction or renal conditions were six times (P < 0.01) and three times (P = 0.01), respectively, more likely to die in hospital than be discharged alive. A longer time from hospital admission until anakinra treatment was associated with significantly higher mortality (P = 0.01). Findings from this real-world study suggest that a shorter time from hospital admission to anakinra treatment is associated with significantly lower ICU admissions and mortality among patients with moderate/severe COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentInterleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist ProteinAgedFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedRespiration, ArtificialRetrospective StudiesInterleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist ProteinanakinraCOVID-19database studiesinterleukin-1 receptor antagonist proteinreal-world evidence

Identifiers

PMID35020840
PMCPMC8767882
OpenAlexW4205526643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.