Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35020751›Full record

ArticlePloS one

Conservation of carbon resources and values on public lands: A case study from the National Wildlife Refuge System.

Zhiliang Zhu, Beth Middleton, Emily Pindilli, Darren Johnson, Kurt Johnson, Scott Covington

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhiliang ZhuU.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6860-6936
Beth MiddletonU.S. Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center, Lafayette, LA, United States of America.
Emily PindilliU.S. Geological Survey, Science and Decisions Center, USGS Northeast Region, Reston, VA, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5101-1266
Darren JohnsonU.S. Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center, Lafayette, LA, United States of America.
Kurt JohnsonU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Falls Church, Virginia, United States of America.
Scott CovingtonU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Falls Church, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9018-2420
United States Geological Survey · USUnited States Fish and Wildlife Service · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public lands in the United States are those land areas managed by federal, state, and county governments for public purposes such as preservation and recreation. Protecting carbon resources and increasing carbon sequestration capacity are compatible with public land management objectives for healthy and resilient habitats, i.e., managing habitats for the benefit of wildlife and ecosystem services can simultaneously capture and store carbon. To evaluate the effect of public land management on carbon storage and review carbon management as part of the land management objectives, we used existing data of carbon stock and net ecosystem carbon balance in a study of the National Wildlife Refuge System (NWRS), a public land management program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service). Total carbon storage of the 364 refuges studied was 16.6 PgC, with a mean value 42,981 gCm-2. We used mixed modeling with Bonferroni adjustment techniques to analyze the effect of time since refuge designation on carbon storage. In general, older refuges store more carbon per unit area than younger refuges. In addition to the age factor, carbon resources are variable by regions and habitat types protected in the refuges. Mean carbon stock and the rate of sequestration are higher within refuges than outside refuges, but the statistical comparison of 364 refuges analyzed in this study was not significant. We also used the social cost of carbon to analyze the annual benefits of sequestrating carbon in these publicly managed lands in the United States, which is over $976 million per year in avoided CO2 emissions via specific conservation management actions. We examine case studies of management, particularly with respect to Service cooperation activities with The Conservation Fund (TCF) Go Zero® Program, Trust for Public Land (TPL) and individuals. Additional opportunities exist in improving techniques to maximize carbon resources in refuges, while continuing to meet the core purpose and need of the NWRS.

Indexed as

Carbon SequestrationClimate ChangeEcosystemAnimalsAnimals, WildCarbonConservation of Natural ResourcesUnited StatesCarbon

Identifiers

PMID35020751
PMCPMC8754292
OpenAlexW4205198095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.