Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35020728›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Topology of synaptic connectivity constrains neuronal stimulus representation, predicting two complementary coding strategies.

Michael W Reimann, Henri Riihimäki, Jason P Smith, Jānis Lazovskis, Christoph Pokorny, Ran Levi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael W ReimannBlue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3455-2367
Henri RiihimäkiUniversity of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Jason P SmithUniversity of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Jānis LazovskisUniversity of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3285-7522
Christoph PokornyBlue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland.
Ran LeviUniversity of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In motor-related brain regions, movement intention has been successfully decoded from in-vivo spike train by isolating a lower-dimension manifold that the high-dimensional spiking activity is constrained to. The mechanism enforcing this constraint remains unclear, although it has been hypothesized to be implemented by the connectivity of the sampled neurons. We test this idea and explore the interactions between local synaptic connectivity and its ability to encode information in a lower dimensional manifold through simulations of a detailed microcircuit model with realistic sources of noise. We confirm that even in isolation such a model can encode the identity of different stimuli in a lower-dimensional space. We then demonstrate that the reliability of the encoding depends on the connectivity between the sampled neurons by specifically sampling populations whose connectivity maximizes certain topological metrics. Finally, we developed an alternative method for determining stimulus identity from the activity of neurons by combining their spike trains with their recurrent connectivity. We found that this method performs better for sampled groups of neurons that perform worse under the classical approach, predicting the possibility of two separate encoding strategies in a single microcircuit.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAction PotentialsAnimalsNeuronsRatsSomatosensory CortexSynaptic Transmission

Identifiers

PMID35020728
PMCPMC8754339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.