Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35020367›Full record

ArticleACS applied materials & interfaces2022

Synthetic DNA for Cell Surface Engineering: Experimental Comparison between Click Conjugation and Lipid Insertion in Terms of Cell Viability, Engineering Efficiency, and Displaying Stability.

Xuelin Wang, Connie Wen, Brandon Davis, Peng Shi, Lidya Abune, Kyungsene Lee, Cheng Dong, Yong Wang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Cell Surface Engineering Tools for Programming Living Assemblies.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xuelin WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University University Park, State College, Pennsylvania 16802, United States.
Connie WenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University University Park, State College, Pennsylvania 16802, United States.
Brandon DavisDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University University Park, State College, Pennsylvania 16802, United States.
Peng ShiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University University Park, State College, Pennsylvania 16802, United States.
Lidya AbuneDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University University Park, State College, Pennsylvania 16802, United States.
Kyungsene LeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University University Park, State College, Pennsylvania 16802, United States.
Cheng DongDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University University Park, State College, Pennsylvania 16802, United States.
Yong WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University University Park, State College, Pennsylvania 16802, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2244-1742
Pennsylvania State University · US

Funding

American Heart Association-American Stroke Association 19IPLOI34770159
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cell surface can be engineered with synthetic DNA for various applications ranging from cancer immunotherapy to tissue engineering. However, while elegant methods such as click conjugation and lipid insertion have been developed to engineer the cell surface with DNA, little effort has been made to systematically evaluate and compare these methods. Resultantly, it is often challenging to choose a right method for a certain application or to interpret data from different studies. In this study, we systematically evaluated click conjugation and lipid insertion in terms of cell viability, engineering efficiency, and displaying stability. Cells engineered with both methods can maintain high viability when the concentration of modified DNA is less than 25-50 μM. However, lipid insertion is faster and more efficient in displaying DNA on the cell surface than click conjugation. The efficiency of displaying DNA with lipid insertion is 10-40 times higher than that with click conjugation for a large range of DNA concentration. However, the half-life of physically inserted DNA on the cell surface is 3-4 times lower than that of covalently conjugated DNA, which depends on the working temperature. While the half-life of physically inserted DNA molecules on the cell surface is shorter than that of DNA molecules clicked onto the cell surface, lipid insertion is more effective than click conjugation in the promotion of cell-cell interactions under the two different experimental settings. The data acquired in this work are expected to act as a guideline for choosing an approximate method for engineering the cell surface with synthetic DNA or even other biomolecules.

Indexed as

Cell EngineeringBiocompatible MaterialsCell CommunicationCell SurvivalDNAKiller Cells, NaturalLipidsMaterials TestingMolecular StructureBiocompatible MaterialsDNALipidscell assemblycell surface engineeringcell viabilityDNA nanotechnologytissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID35020367
PMCPMC12056530
OpenAlexW4205567479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.