Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35020260›Full record

ArticleLiver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society2022

Risk Factors for Posttransplantation Mortality in Recipients With Grade 3 Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure: Analysis of a North American Consortium.

Vinay Sundaram, Sarvanand Patel, Kirti Shetty, Christina C Lindenmeyer, Robert S Rahimi, Gianina Flocco, Atef Al-Attar, Constantine J Karvellas, Suryanarayana Challa, Harapriya Maddur and 11 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Liver Transplantation in the Context of Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF): Where Do We Stand in 2025?Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025
    Review
  5. Common definitions and variables are needed for the United States to join the conversation on acute-on-chronic liver failure.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. PROGNOSTIC FACTORS OF LIVER TRANSPLANTATION FOR ACUTE-ON-CHRONIC LIVER FAILURE.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 11 institutions in 3 countries.

Vinay SundaramKarsh Division of Gastroenterology and Comprehensive Transplant Center, Department of Medicine Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles CA Department of Medicine University of Maryland Medical Center Baltimore MD 2569 Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute Baylor University Medical CenterBaylor Scott and White Dallas TX Department of Critical Care and Division of Gastroenterology (Liver Unit) University of Alberta Edmonton AB Canada Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine Northwestern University Chicago IL Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine Oregon Health and Sciences University Portland OR Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine University of Colorado School of Medicine Aurora CO Piedmont Transplant Institute Piedmont Healthcare Atlanta GA Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY.
Sarvanand Patel
Kirti Shetty
Christina C Lindenmeyer
Robert S Rahimi
Gianina Flocco
Atef Al-Attar
Constantine J Karvellas
Suryanarayana Challa
Harapriya Maddur
Janice H Jou
Michael Kriss
Lance L Stein
Alex H Xiao
Ross H Vyhmeister
Ellen W Green
Braidie Campbell
William Cranford
Nadim Mahmud
Brett E Fortune
Multi‐Organ Dysfunction and Evaluation for Liver Transplantation (MODEL) Consortium
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · USOregon Health & Science University · USCleveland Clinic · USNorthwestern University · USPiedmont HealthCare · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USBaylor University Medical Center · USCornell University · USHospital of the University of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

Improving Surgical Risk Prediction and Decision Making among Patients with CirrhosisK08DK124577 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MAHMUD, NADIM · 2021 to 2025
$835k
NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK124577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although liver transplantation (LT) yields survival benefit for patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure grade 3 (ACLF-3), knowledge gaps remain regarding risk factors for post-LT mortality. We retrospectively reviewed data from 10 centers in the United States and Canada for patients transplanted between 2018 and 2019 and who required care in the intensive care unit prior to LT. ACLF was identified using the European Association for the Study of the Liver-Chronic Liver Failure (EASL-CLIF) criteria. A total of 318 patients were studied, of whom 106 (33.3%) had no ACLF, 61 (19.1%) had ACLF-1, 74 (23.2%) had ACLF-2, and 77 (24.2%) had ACLF-3 at transplantation. Survival probability 1 year after LT was significantly higher in patients without ACLF (94.3%) compared with patients with ACLF (87.3%; P = 0.02), but similar between ACLF-1 (88.5%), ACLF-2 (87.8%), and ACLF-3 (85.7%; P = 0.26). Recipients with ACLF-3 and circulatory failure (n = 29) had similar 1-year post-LT survival (82.3%) compared with patients with ACLF-3 without circulatory failure (89.6%; P = 0.32), including those requiring multiple vasopressors. For patients transplanted with ACLF-3 including respiratory failure (n = 20), there was a trend toward significantly lower post-LT survival (P =  0.07) among those with respiratory failure (74.1%) compared with those without (91.0%). The presence of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) at LT for patients with ACLF-3 (n = 15), however, yielded significantly lower survival (91.9% versus 57.1%; P < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that PVT was significantly associated with post-LT mortality within 1 year (odds ratio, 7.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-28.3). No correlation was found between survival after LT and the location or extent of PVT, presence of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, or anticoagulation. LT in patients with ACLF-3 requiring vasopressors yields excellent 1-year survival. LT should be approached cautiously among candidates with ACLF-3 and PVT.

Indexed as

Acute-On-Chronic Liver FailureLiver TransplantationRespiratory InsufficiencyHumansLiver CirrhosisNorth AmericaPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID35020260
PMCPMC9117404
OpenAlexW4205350231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.