Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35020178›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2022

Post-Marketing Safety Profile of Vortioxetine Using a Cluster Analysis and a Disproportionality Analysis of Global Adverse Event Reports.

Corine Ekhart, Florence van Hunsel, Eugène van Puijenbroek, Rebecca Chandler, Eva-Lisa Meldau, Henric Taavola, G Niklas Norén

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Corine EkhartNetherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, Goudsbloemvallei 7, 5237, MH's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands. c.ekhart@lareb.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-2252-0467
Florence van HunselNetherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, Goudsbloemvallei 7, 5237, MH's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8965-3224
Eugène van PuijenbroekNetherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, Goudsbloemvallei 7, 5237, MH's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2236-1398
Rebecca ChandlerUppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9334-9046
Eva-Lisa MeldauUppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0268-7769
Henric TaavolaUppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2604-2810
G Niklas NorénUppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4595-230X
Uppsala Monitoring Centre · SEUniversity of Groningen · NLNetherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVortioxetine, a multimodal serotonergic drug, is widely used as treatment for major depressive disorder. Although on the market since late 2013, the data of the relative safety of vortioxetine, especially compared to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, are still scarce.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to explore the adverse event reporting pattern of vortioxetine through a cluster analysis. Furthermore, to compare the adverse event reporting pattern for vortioxetine with that of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.

methodsIndividual case safety reports for vortioxetine in VigiBase up to 1 November, 2019 were subjected to consensus clustering, to identify and describe natural groupings of reports based on their reported adverse events. A vigiPoint exploratory analysis compared vortioxetine to the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in terms of relative frequencies for a wide range of covariates, including patient sex and age, reported drugs and adverse events, and reporting country. Important differences were identified using odds ratios with adaptive statistical shrinkage.

resultsThirty-six clusters containing at least five reports were identified and analysed. The two largest clusters included 48% of the vortioxetine reports and appeared to represent gastrointestinal adverse events and hypersensitivity adverse events. Other distinct clusters were related to, respectively, fatigue, aggression/suicidality, convulsion, medication errors, arthralgia/myalgia, increased weight, paraesthesia and anticholinergic effects. Some of these clusters are not labelled for vortioxetine, such as arthralgia/myalgia and paraesthesia, but are known adverse events for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. A vigiPoint analysis revealed a higher proportion of reports from consumers and non-health professionals for vortioxetine as well as higher relative reporting rates of gastrointestinal symptoms, pruritus and mood-related symptoms, consistent with the cluster analysis.

conclusionsA pattern of co-reported adverse events that is consistent with labelled adverse events for vortioxetine and the safety profile for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in general was revealed. Clusters of unlabelled adverse events were identified that reflect clinical entities that might represent signals of previously unknown adverse events. More extensive analyses of spontaneous reports may help to further understand the reporting pattern of adverse events.

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsArthralgiaCluster AnalysisHumansMarketingMyalgiaParesthesiaVortioxetineSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsVortioxetine

Identifiers

PMID35020178
PMCPMC8857005
OpenAlexW4205147861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.