ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2022
A dosimetric comparison of CT- and photogrammetry- generated 3D printed HDR brachytherapy surface applicators.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- HDR Mould-Based Brachytherapy for Cutaneous Neoplasms: Toxicity, Long-Term Control, Cosmesis and PROMs.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Synthetic cranial MRI from 3D optical surface scans using deep learning for radiation therapy treatment planning.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2023Article
- Can optical scanning technologies replace CT for 3D printed medical devices in radiation oncology?Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we investigate whether an acceptable dosimetric plan can be obtained for a brachytherapy surface applicator designed using photogrammetry and compare the plan quality to a CT-derived applicator. The nose region of a RANDO anthropomorphic phantom was selected as the treatment site due to its high curvature. Photographs were captured using a Nikon D5600 DSLR camera and reconstructed using Agisoft Metashape while CT data was obtained using a Canon Aquillion scanner. Virtual surface applicators were designed in Blender and printed with PLA plastic. Treatment plans with a prescription dose of 3.85 Gy × 10 fractions with 100% dose to PTV on the bridge of the nose at 2 mm depth were generated separately using AcurosBV in the Varian BrachyVision TPS. PTV D
Indexed as
Identifiers
35020174What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.