Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35020170›Full record

Trial reportClinical drug investigation2022

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring-Guided Adjuvant Tamoxifen Dosing in Patients with Early Breast Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis from the Prospective TOTAM Trial.

C Louwrens Braal, Anne Kleijburg, Agnes Jager, Stijn L W Koolen, Ron H J Mathijssen, Isaac Corro Ramos, Pim Wetzelaer, Carin A Uyl-de Groot

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical drug investigation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

C Louwrens BraalDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. c.braal@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3600-9851
Anne KleijburgErasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Agnes JagerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Stijn L W KoolenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ron H J MathijssenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Isaac Corro RamosInstitute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Pim WetzelaerErasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Carin A Uyl-de GrootErasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLErasmus MC · NLMaastricht University · NL

Funding

Erasmus Medisch Centrum grant number 2017-17108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesEndoxifen is the active metabolite of tamoxifen, and a minimal plasma concentration of 16 nM has been suggested as a threshold above which it is effective in reducing the risk of breast cancer recurrence. The aim of the current analysis was to investigate the cost-effectiveness of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-guided tamoxifen dosing.

methodsA cost-effectiveness analysis was performed from a Dutch healthcare perspective, using a partitioned survival model and a lifetime horizon. The reduction in subtherapeutic treatment following TDM is modelled as improved rates of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in comparison to standard tamoxifen treatment. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) and a series of scenario analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the results.

resultsBase-case results estimated a total increase in life years and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for TDM of 0.40 and 0.53, respectively. Total costs for TDM and standard tamoxifen treatment are €32,893 and €39,524, respectively. The TDM intervention results in both more QALYs and less healthcare costs, indicating a dominating effect for TDM. The PSA results indicate that the probability of TDM being cost-effective is 92% when using a willingness-to-pay threshold of €20,000.

conclusionsTDM-guided dose optimization of tamoxifen is estimated to save costs and increase QALYs for early breast cancer patients.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCost-Benefit AnalysisDrug MonitoringFemaleHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProspective StudiesQuality-Adjusted Life YearsTamoxifenTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID35020170
PMCPMC8844136
OpenAlexW4206831982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.