Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35020157›Full record

ArticleNeurology and therapy2022

Therapy Switches in Fingolimod-Treated Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: Long-Term Experience from the German MS Registry.

Niklas Frahm, Firas Fneish, David Ellenberger, Peter Flachenecker, Friedemann Paul, Clemens Warnke, Christoph Kleinschnitz, Tina Parciak, Dagmar Krefting, Kerstin Hellwig and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Real-world evaluation of ocrelizumab in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Niklas FrahmMS Forschungs- Und Projektentwicklungs-gGmbH (MS Research and Project Development gGmbH [MSFP]), Krausenstr. 50, 30171, Hannover, Germany. frahm@msregister.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4655-774X
Firas FneishMS Forschungs- Und Projektentwicklungs-gGmbH (MS Research and Project Development gGmbH [MSFP]), Krausenstr. 50, 30171, Hannover, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8279-8463
David EllenbergerMS Forschungs- Und Projektentwicklungs-gGmbH (MS Research and Project Development gGmbH [MSFP]), Krausenstr. 50, 30171, Hannover, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2274-5025
Peter FlacheneckerNeurological Rehabilitation Center Quellenhof, Kuranlagenallee 2, 75323, Bad Wildbad, Germany.
Friedemann PaulExperimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Lindenberger Weg 80, 13125, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6378-0070
Clemens WarnkeDepartment of Neurology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3510-9255
Christoph KleinschnitzDepartment of Neurology and Center of Translational and Behavioral Neurosciences (C-TNBS), University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Tina ParciakDepartment of Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Von-Siebold-Str. 3, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Dagmar KreftingDepartment of Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Von-Siebold-Str. 3, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Kerstin HellwigDepartment of Neurology, St. Joseph and St. Elisabeth Hospital-Ruhr University, Gudrunstr. 56, 44791, Bochum, Germany.
Judith HaasDeutsche Multiple Sklerose Gesellschaft, Bundesverband e.V. (German Multiple Sclerosis Society [DMSG], Federal Association), Krausenstr. 50, 30171, Hannover, Germany.
Paulus S RommerNeuroimmunological Section, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center of Rostock, Gehlsheimer Str. 20, 18147, Rostock, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5209-6647
Alexander StahmannMS Forschungs- Und Projektentwicklungs-gGmbH (MS Research and Project Development gGmbH [MSFP]), Krausenstr. 50, 30171, Hannover, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5308-105X
Uwe K ZettlNeuroimmunological Section, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center of Rostock, Gehlsheimer Str. 20, 18147, Rostock, Germany.
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEUniversity of Rostock · DEDeutsche Multiple Sklerose Gesellschaft · DEEssen University Hospital · DEGesellschaft für Fertigungstechnik und Entwicklung · DEMax Delbrück Center · DENeurologisches Rehabilitationszentrum Quellenhof Bad Wildbad · DESt. Elisabeth-Hospital Bochum · DEUniversity Hospital Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionsTherapy switches in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) receiving treatment with fingolimod occur frequently in clinical practice but are not well represented in real-world data. The aim of this study was to identify and characterize treatment switches and reveal sociodemographic/clinical changes over time in fingolimod-treated people with MS (PwMS).

methodsData on 2536 fingolimod-treated PwMS extracted from the German MS Registry during different time periods were analyzed (2010-2019).

resultsOverall, 28.3% of PwMS were treatment-naïve before fingolimod initiation. Interferon beta (30.7%) was the most common pre-fingolimod treatment. Ocrelizumab (19.8%) was the most frequent subsequent treatment in the 944 patients on fingolimod who switched. Between 2010 and 2019, median disease duration at fingolimod initiation decreased from 8.5 to 7.1 years (p < 0.001), and patients taking fingolimod for ≥ 1 year after treatment initiation decreased from 89.6 to 80.5% (p < 0.001). Females (p < 0.001) and young patients (p = 0.003) showed a shorter time on fingolimod. The most frequent reason for switching was disease activity (relapse/MRI) despite treatment. The annualized relapse rate increased from 0.37 in patients on fingolimod to 0.47 after treatment cessation, decreasing to 0.19 after treatment with a subsequent disease-modifying drug (DMD) was initiated.

conclusionTreatment switches from fingolimod to subsequent DMDs currently occur after shorter treatment durations than 10 years ago, possibly due to the growing treatment spectrum. Planning adequate washout periods is essential and should be done on an individualized basis.

Indexed as

Disease-modifying drugFingolimodMultiple sclerosisReboundTreatment switches

Identifiers

PMID35020157
PMCPMC8857375
OpenAlexW4206385049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.