Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35020154›Full record

ReviewHepatology international2022

Application of machine learning in liver transplantation: a review.

Jason Tran, Divya Sharma, Neta Gotlieb, Wei Xu, Mamatha Bhat

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Hepatology international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jason TranDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Divya SharmaDepartment of Biostatistics, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Neta GotliebAjmera Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Wei XuDepartment of Biostatistics, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Mamatha BhatAjmera Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada. mamatha.bhat@uhn.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMachine learning (ML) has been increasingly applied in the health-care and liver transplant setting. The demand for liver transplantation continues to expand on an international scale, and with advanced aging and complex comorbidities, many challenges throughout the transplantation decision-making process must be better addressed. There exist massive datasets with hidden, non-linear relationships between demographic, clinical, laboratory, genetic, and imaging parameters that conventional methods fail to capitalize on when reviewing their predictive potential. Pre-transplant challenges include addressing efficacies of liver segmentation, hepatic steatosis assessment, and graft allocation. Post-transplant applications include predicting patient survival, graft rejection and failure, and post-operative morbidity risk.

aimIn this review, we describe a comprehensive summary of ML applications in liver transplantation including the clinical context and how to overcome challenges for clinical implementation.

methodsTwenty-nine articles were identified from Ovid MEDLINE, MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print and In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.

conclusionML is vastly interrogated in liver transplantation with promising applications in pre- and post-transplant settings. Although challenges exist including site-specific training requirements, the demand for more multi-center studies, and optimization hurdles for clinical interpretability, the powerful potential of ML merits further exploration to enhance patient care.

Indexed as

Liver TransplantationDatabases, FactualGraft RejectionHumansMachine LearningSystematic Reviews as TopicArtificial intelligenceDeep learningGraft allocationGraft rejectionHepatosteatosisLiver diseaseLiver segmentationOrthoptic liver transplantPost-transplant comorbidityPost-transplant survival

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.